Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Do not write an empty file when using --json-file-output [CLI-115] #5030

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

PeterSchafer
Copy link
Contributor

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer commented Feb 2, 2024

Pull Request Submission

Please check the boxes once done.

The pull request must:

  • Reviewer Documentation
    • follow CONTRIBUTING rules
    • be accompanied by a detailed description of the changes
    • contain a risk assessment of the change (Low | Medium | High) with regards to breaking existing functionality. A change e.g. of an underlying language plugin can completely break the functionality for that language, but appearing as only a version change in the dependencies.
    • highlight breaking API if applicable
    • contain a link to the automatic tests that cover the updated functionality.
    • contain testing instructions in case that the reviewer wants to manual verify as well, to add to the manual testing done by the author.
    • link to the link to the PR for the User-facing documentation
  • User facing Documentation
    • update any relevant documentation in gitbook by submitting a gitbook PR, and including the PR link here
    • ensure that the message of the final single commit is descriptive and prefixed with either feat: or fix: , others might be used in rare occasions as well, if there is no need to document the changes in the release notes. The changes or fixes should be described in detail in the commit message for the changelog & release notes.
  • Testing
    • Changes, removals and additions to functionality must be covered by acceptance / integration tests or smoke tests - either already existing ones, or new ones, created by the author of the PR.

Pull Request Review

All pull requests must undergo a thorough review process before being merged.
The review process of the code PR should include code review, testing, and any necessary feedback or revisions.
Pull request reviews of functionality developed in other teams only review the given documentation and test reports.

Manual testing will not be performed by the reviewing team, and is the responsibility of the author of the PR.

For Node projects: It’s important to make sure changes in package.json are also affecting package-lock.json correctly.

If a dependency is not necessary, don’t add it.

When adding a new package as a dependency, make sure that the change is absolutely necessary. We would like to refrain from adding new dependencies when possible.
Documentation PRs in gitbook are reviewed by Snyk's content team. They will also advise on the best phrasing and structuring if needed.

Pull Request Approval

Once a pull request has been reviewed and all necessary revisions have been made, it is approved for merging into
the main codebase. The merging of the code PR is performed by the code owners, the merging of the documentation PR
by our content writers.

What does this PR do?

This PR fixes a regression when for example running snyk code test --json-file-output=<filename> when the tested project doesn't contain any issues at all. The expected behaviour as per documentation is not to generate a file at all in this case. In #5007 an added check for an empty object was incorrect and created this regression.
With this PR, the check is adapted and a closed box test is added to ensure the documented behaviour is maintained.

Risk: Low, due minimal code impact

Where should the reviewer start?

main.ts

How should this be manually tested?

Run snyk code test --json-file-output=<filename> on a project that doesn't have any code issues.

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

CLI-115
#5028

Screenshots

Additional questions

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer requested a review from a team as a code owner February 2, 2024 09:57
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Warnings
⚠️

Since the CLI is unifying on a standard and improved tooling, we're starting to migrate old-style imports and exports to ES6 ones.
A file you've modified is using either module.exports or require(). If you can, please update them to ES6 import syntax and export syntax.
Files found:

  • src/cli/main.ts

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against fc4de65

@@ -146,4 +146,17 @@ describe('test --json-file-output', () => {
});
expect(fileSize).toBeGreaterThan(500000000); // ~0.5GB
}, 120000);

it('test --json-file-ouput does not write an empty file if no issues are found', async () => {
const project = await createProjectFromWorkspace('golang-gomodules');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick: Can we give this project a more descriptive name, such as empty-golang-project?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately naming is always difficult :) The project is not really empty, I just highjacked an existing project and added a go file that really doesn't have any code issues. So I'd rather leave the name, since I feel anything could be misunderstand by someone in this case.

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer merged commit fd91b7c into master Feb 2, 2024
16 checks passed
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer deleted the fix/CLI-115_empy_json branch February 2, 2024 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants