Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong size for BATCH_JOB_INSTANCE.JOB_KEY in Appendix A #4071

Closed
rod2j opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Wrong size for BATCH_JOB_INSTANCE.JOB_KEY in Appendix A #4071

rod2j opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
for: backport-to-4.3.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 4.3.x line in: documentation type: bug
Milestone

Comments

@rod2j
Copy link
Contributor

rod2j commented Mar 2, 2022

It looks like the documented schema for table BATCH_JOB_INSTANCE in Appendix A - Meta-Data Schema doesn't match the actual schema for this table:

  • Actual size of the JOB_KEY column is 32 (cf. actual schema) but is documented as 2500
@fmbenhassine
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for raising this issue and for opening a PR! Indeed there is a mismatch between the size in the actual schema and the docs. I will plan the fix for the next release.

@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added in: documentation for: backport-to-4.3.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 4.3.x line and removed status: waiting-for-triage Issues that we did not analyse yet labels Mar 4, 2022
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine added this to the 5.0.0-M2 milestone Mar 4, 2022
@fmbenhassine fmbenhassine changed the title [doc] Wrong size for BATCH_JOB_INSTANCE.JOB_KEY in Appendix A Wrong size for BATCH_JOB_INSTANCE.JOB_KEY in Appendix A Mar 23, 2022
lcmarvin pushed a commit to lcmarvin/spring-batch that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
for: backport-to-4.3.x Issues that will be back-ported to the 4.3.x line in: documentation type: bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants