Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[DISCUSS] Whether need support more primitive type #85

Open
hangc0276 opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[DISCUSS] Whether need support more primitive type #85

hangc0276 opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@hangc0276
Copy link
Collaborator

Motivation

In #75, we supported String and Bytes primitive types for the lakehouse sink connector. In general case, it is enough.

We are not sure whether we need to support other primitive types that Pulsar supported.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hangc0276