Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cover gh-lint #44

Open
bebraw opened this issue Oct 11, 2017 · 9 comments
Open

Cover gh-lint #44

bebraw opened this issue Oct 11, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@bebraw
Copy link
Member

bebraw commented Oct 11, 2017

There's a stub in #42. It won't need much. A paragraph or two.

@bebraw bebraw added this to the v1.0 milestone Oct 11, 2017
@sapegin
Copy link
Member

sapegin commented Nov 19, 2017

I’m actually not sure it’s really useful. Do you know anyone using this?

@bebraw
Copy link
Member Author

bebraw commented Nov 19, 2017

@epoberezkin uses it internally MailOnline.

@sapegin sapegin added the maybe label Nov 20, 2017
@sapegin
Copy link
Member

sapegin commented Nov 21, 2017

Looks like the use case is many many repositories created by random people, so you need to check thinks like description on GitHub.

@bebraw
Copy link
Member Author

bebraw commented Nov 21, 2017

Correct. It's something for organizations that want to ensure people provide the right meta information for projects for example.

@sapegin
Copy link
Member

sapegin commented Nov 21, 2017

Who are these people? :-)

@bebraw
Copy link
Member Author

bebraw commented Nov 21, 2017

It's not a mainstream idea yet. We can leave the issue open for now and decide later. It's not primary content for sure.

@epoberezkin
Copy link

We don't just check meta - more about checking guidelines. E.g., branches are protected, PRs are approved before they are merged, commits are connected to github users, etc.

@sapegin
Copy link
Member

sapegin commented Nov 21, 2017

@epoberezkin But what’s the scale of the project / team where you actually need this?

@epoberezkin
Copy link

I think if the team is bigger than 20 people it becomes useful... We have 100 different repos updated every week, 200 every month.

@sapegin sapegin removed this from the v1.0 milestone Dec 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants