feat(es/compat): Readonly and writeonly private field

[Austaras]

Description:

This is the most useless feature I've ever wrote.

BREAKING CHANGE:

Related issue (if exists):
closes #5599

[jridgewell]

Can you add a test case for the writing to a private method?

class Foo {
  #method() {
  }

  test() {
    // methods are always read-only.
    this.#method = 1;
  }
}

[Austaras]

Can you add a test case for the writing to a private method?

class Foo {
  #method() {
  }

  test() {
    // methods are always read-only.
    this.#method = 1;
  }
}

I prefer not to, as there's already tsc test privateNameReadonly

[jridgewell]

Ah, I didn't realize privateNameReadonly.1.normal.js was testing a private method. There doesn't seem to be a source file in our repo?

[kdy1]

@jridgewell It's in crates/swc_ecma_parser/tests/tsc

[kdy1]

swc-bump:

• swc_ecma_transforms_compat

[swc-bot]

Automated review comment generated by auto-rebase script

---