TypeScript: x < y >>>= z is incorrectly interpreted as a type argument list

[evanw]

Describe the bug

SWC's interpretation of type arguments in TypeScript code is different than the TypeScript compiler, which can cause SWC to generate incorrect JavaScript.

This is a follow-up to #7387, which was not fixed correctly.

Input code

declare let fn: any, x: any, y: any
declare function z<A, B>(_: any): any
fn(z < Number, Object > (y))
fn(z < Number, Object > = y)
fn(x < y, x > y)
fn(x < y, x >= y)
fn(x < y, x >> y)
fn(x < y, x >>= y)
fn(x < y, x >>>= y)
fn(x < y, x < y, x >>= y)
fn(x < y, x < y, x >>> y)
fn(x < y, x < y, x >>>= y)

Config

(I only ran SWC via the playground)

Playground link

https://play.swc.rs/?version=1.3.58&code=H4sIAAAAAAAAA0tJTc5JLEpVyEktUUjLs1JIzKvUUaiA0pVgmisFqiatNC%2B5JDM%2FT6HKxlFHwclOIx4srwlRlZanUaVgo%2BBXmpuUWqSj4J%2BUlZpcomCnoFGpqYlT0lahEixZAZQEWQwUQhfAVIKpBpsiTDHcqhGacMuANQEAPpF21y8BAAA%3D&config=H4sIAAAAAAAAA1VPOw7DIAzdOQXy3CHK0KF36CEQdSIqfsKOVBTl7oUE0maz38fveRVSwps0PORaxrJElQjTuReEsmf1KQhwjkg6mchw6yxTpSZlCXdoOxhglWbk6kIah3FoDrAhEHZHw5zxZsr%2FmTq4mJDoKqxS5WeL10TRUsGF17KT7Zfa92hwh5%2Boh52HwdCzOzktKLYvIO%2B2AhcBAAA%3D

Expected behavior

SWC should generate the same output as the TypeScript compiler does:

fn(z(y));
fn((z) = y);
fn(x < y, x > y);
fn(x < y, x >= y);
fn(x < y, x >> y);
fn(x < y, x >>= y);
fn(x < y, x >>>= y);
fn(x < y, x < y, x >>= y);
fn(x < y, x < y, x >>> y);
fn(x < y, x < y, x >>>= y);

Actual behavior

Starting with version 1.3.58, SWC fails to parse this code with a syntax error (due to the incorrect fix for #7387):

  x Expression expected
   ,-[input.ts:1:1]
 4 | fn(z < Number, Object > = y)
   :                         ^

This syntax error is a regression from 1.3.57.

And if that line is commented out, SWC still incorrectly transforms fn(x < y, x >>>= y) into fn(x >>= y) and fn(x < y, x < y, x >>>= y) into fn(x < y, x >>= y).

Version

1.3.58

Additional context

No response

[swc-bot]

This closed issue has been automatically locked because it had no new activity for a month. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you.