Fix intellisense for plugins with multiple @apply rules
#8213
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Intellisense uses `expandApplyAtRules` directly and doesn’t partition them. When a plugin registers components using something like `”@apply flex”: {}` more than once in the same component intellisense will break. This isn’t a problem for Tailwind CSS proper because we do rule partitioning. Given that Intellisense is using it directly though we shouldn’t outright break in the face of this situation even if the result isn’t 100% accurate (the source maps won’t be correct in this case). Co-authored-by: psucoder <hungle.info@gmail.com>
47 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Intellisense uses
expandApplyAtRulesdirectly and doesn’t partition them. When a plugin registers components using something like”@apply flex”: {}more than once in the same component intellisense will break. This isn’t a problem for Tailwind CSS proper because we do rule partitioning. Given that Intellisense is using it directly though we shouldn’t outright break in the face of this situation even if the result isn’t 100% accurate (the source maps won’t be correct for all but the first@applyfound but that should not cause issues for Intellisense).Fixes #8203