Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] AWS SQS Sample #296

Open
michaelangeloio opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #297
Open

[Feature Request] AWS SQS Sample #296

michaelangeloio opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #297
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@michaelangeloio
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Using Temporal IO alongside an AWS FIFO queue (or AWS queue in general) can be beneficial for several reasons:

  • Decoupling of Services: In environments where two services cannot communicate over the same local network due to being in different clusters or policy constraints, a queue acts as a mediator. AWS SQS can store messages until they're consumed, ensuring that messages aren't lost even if the consuming service isn't immediately available.

  • Integration with Existing Architecture: For organizations that have already invested in AWS and use SQS queues, integrating Temporal can enhance the processing capabilities without a complete overhaul. Temporal can be introduced to handle the business logic, retries, and workflows, while SQS continues to act as the message broker.

  • Ordered Processing: FIFO queues ensure that messages are processed in the order they are sent, which is crucial in scenarios like financial transactions or data synchronization.

Describe the solution you'd like

Sample folder that shows some basic setup!

@michaelangeloio michaelangeloio added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 8, 2023
@michaelangeloio michaelangeloio linked a pull request Oct 8, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant