Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

app_service_environment: add field resource_group_name #6821

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 13, 2020

Conversation

magodo
Copy link
Collaborator

@magodo magodo commented May 8, 2020

This PR allows user to explicitly specify the resource group for app_service_environment, instead of implicitly using the one from Subnet.
In order to keep compatibility, the newly added resource_group_name is set as Optional+Computed, which should be changed to Required when a major version of provider bumps.

Fix /#6699.

Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @magodo
Thanks for this PR.
Just a couple of really minor changes below. I'll run the acceptance tests today in readiness for merge.

Ste

@@ -35,6 +35,16 @@ func SchemaResourceGroupNameForDataSource() *schema.Schema {
}
}

func SchemaResourceGroupNameOC() *schema.Schema {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we have this as SchemaResourceGroupNameOptionalComputed so it's clearer purpose?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure

@magodo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

magodo commented May 12, 2020

@jackofallops Thank you for your comment!
I have updated the code accordingly, PTAL!

@jackofallops
Copy link
Member

Tests pass (2 failures unrelated to PR / transient)
image

@jackofallops jackofallops added this to the v2.10.0 milestone May 13, 2020
@jackofallops jackofallops merged commit a685a47 into hashicorp:master May 13, 2020
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • didn't refresh before submitting review 😅

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 15, 2020

This has been released in version 2.10.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.10.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 12, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 12, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants