Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New data source: azurerm_advisor_recommendations #6867

Merged
merged 8 commits into from May 26, 2020

Conversation

yupwei68
Copy link
Contributor

fix: #6119
image

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Member

hi @yupwei68

Thanks for opening this PR.

Taking a look through here, whilst the code for this looks good - thinking about use-cases for this functionality, it appears this is something that a user would opt to do interactively (using the Azure CLI) or automatically (via the HTTP API's) - rather than something that's useful in Terraform (since there's no means of a user performing actions based on these recommendations).

As such whilst I'd like to thank you for this contribution - since it appears this functionality isn't suited to Terraform I'm going to close this pull request for the moment - but we'd recommend instead using the Azure CLI to run interactive commands like this.

Thanks!

@katbyte katbyte reopened this May 19, 2020
@yupwei68 yupwei68 closed this May 20, 2020
@yupwei68 yupwei68 reopened this May 20, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @yupwei68, overall this looks good but i have some questions about the schema names i've left inline.

website/docs/d/advisor_recommendations.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
},
},

"resource_group_names_filter": azure.SchemaResourceGroupNameSetOptional(),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and

Suggested change
"resource_group_names_filter": azure.SchemaResourceGroupNameSetOptional(),
"filter_by_resource_groups": azure.SchemaResourceGroupNameSetOptional(),

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also not sure its worth creating a schema function for this given its not duplicated anywhere else/

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I add a schema function because during the reviewing of this PR, the schema function in resource_group.go continues to be added. I need to change all the ValidateFunc: validateResourceGroupName to ValidateFunc: ValidateResourceGroupName

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think I shall remove the schema function?

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.11.0 milestone May 20, 2020
@yupwei68
Copy link
Contributor Author

@katbyte , Please continue reviewing.

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label May 20, 2020
@katbyte katbyte modified the milestones: v2.11.0, v2.12.0 May 22, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @yupwei68! LGTM 👍

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 6b2b5d3 into hashicorp:master May 26, 2020
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 28, 2020

This has been released in version 2.12.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.12.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

pbrit pushed a commit to pbrit/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request May 31, 2020
pbrit pushed a commit to pbrit/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request May 31, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 25, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 25, 2020
@yupwei68 yupwei68 deleted the wyp-advisor-suppression branch July 10, 2020 02:04
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New resource azurerm_advisor
3 participants