Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What do I need to migrate from glob to fdir #38

Open
StoneCypher opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

What do I need to migrate from glob to fdir #38

StoneCypher opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@StoneCypher
Copy link
Contributor

Hi. I'm an active user of glob and 92% faster seems neat.

In order to switch, I need to know that my existing patterns will be maintained. Will you please create a near-top readme section telling me how the two libraries' pattern outlay lines up?

Some of the fuss between glob and other competitors was when glob chose to remove features to come into line with other standards. I'd like to know where those topics stand, and if they line up, I will probably switch

Thanks for listening

@thecodrr
Copy link
Owner

thecodrr commented Aug 3, 2020

fdir internally depends on picomatch for glob pattern matching. Glob uses minimatch. There is an extensive comparison between the two on picomatch readme.

I have intentions to make it pluggable so you can choose which library you want to use but that is still just an idea.

@thecodrr
Copy link
Owner

thecodrr commented Aug 3, 2020

I will also add a Migration guide for people looking to migrate. Any help regarding that is welcome.

@thecodrr thecodrr changed the title What I need to switch What do I need to migrate from glob to fdir Aug 3, 2020
@thecodrr thecodrr added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants