Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for IO_LINK feature #289

Open
SidongYang opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #294
Open

Support for IO_LINK feature #289

SidongYang opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #294

Comments

@SidongYang
Copy link

Hi, we use tokio uring well in our work. and also we need IO_LINK feature in tokio uring.
I agree that we should consider API design for the link feature. #86

I wrote some example code that support flags in write_at, read_at API. It just add [read|write]_at_with_flags that add flags for original code. Also we need to unsubmitted read API for await in async task.
SidongYang#1

But I'm not sure that this code is good way to support flags. In example, it creates async tasks for await multiple events. I think it's little bad for tokio uring that uses single threaded.

@ileixe ileixe linked a pull request Jan 30, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant