Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TypeScript support #86

Open
tommmyy opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

TypeScript support #86

tommmyy opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@tommmyy
Copy link
Owner

tommmyy commented May 23, 2018

Add TS dictionary to @types

@Maus3rVonDutch
Copy link

Maus3rVonDutch commented Oct 15, 2019

Hi, this ticket is opened over a year ago, is this still actively worked on, or is this issue abandoned altogether?

@tommmyy
Copy link
Owner Author

tommmyy commented Oct 15, 2019

@lukasduspiva ?

@lukasduspiva
Copy link
Collaborator

lukasduspiva commented Oct 15, 2019

Hi, the work on this task is postponed because we realized that functional JavaScript (which is the core of ramda-extension) is not well supported in strict TypeScript and we had several problems of using it even with Ramda functions which are already typed. Therefore it is not a big priority for us to write the typings. On the other hand, any volunteers with the focus on this domain are welcomed.

@Maus3rVonDutch
Copy link

Ok a bit disappointing, but I do understand. For now I only need a handful of extensions, so I think I can get way with writing some custom *.d.ts files.

Thnx for the response and your explanation.

@tommmyy
Copy link
Owner Author

tommmyy commented Oct 16, 2019

@Maus3rVonDutch you are welcome to help!

@Maus3rVonDutch
Copy link

Yes I understand I could, but I’m not able to do so. I no longer do any work at home anymore since a burnout a couple of years ago and in my work I don’t have the time to participate in any opensource projects.

@mribichich
Copy link

Were you guys thinking on adding the types to the repo or to @types ?

And are you expecting to have all the types for each function or should we add one at a time?

cos I'm starting to use the lib, and I can start adding types... But I dont know if I'll be able to add them all

what are your thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants