Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate with the Racket distro and deprecate #2

Open
tonyg opened this issue Mar 25, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Integrate with the Racket distro and deprecate #2

tonyg opened this issue Mar 25, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@tonyg
Copy link
Owner

tonyg commented Mar 25, 2014

The intention here is to replace the existing Racket websocket code with this code, and mark this package as for legacy use only. /cc @samth

@jeapostrophe
Copy link

I think we should do the opposite and make this provide the same interface as net/websocket optionally. It is good to split up code into many pkgs imho.

@lexi-lambda
Copy link
Contributor

If we do that, I think it would be helpful to rename this package websocket and move this code into the net/websocket collection, since rfc6455 isn't a very descriptive name.

@lexi-lambda
Copy link
Contributor

Any further thoughts on this, a year later? I’d still appreciate renaming this package to websocket and exposing net/websocket, then just having rfc6455 reprovide everything.

@jeapostrophe
Copy link

Go for it!

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Alexis King notifications@github.com
wrote:

Any further thoughts on this, a year later? I’d still appreciate renaming
this package to websocket and exposing net/websocket, then just having
rfc6455 reprovide everything.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).

Jay McCarthy
Associate Professor
PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell
http://jeapostrophe.github.io

       "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing,
  for ye are laying the foundation of a great work.

And out of small things proceedeth that which is great."
- D&C 64:33

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants