Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this project dead? #841

Open
refi64 opened this issue May 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Is this project dead? #841

refi64 opened this issue May 4, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@refi64
Copy link
Contributor

refi64 commented May 4, 2015

There haven't been any commits since 2014...

@timfel
Copy link
Member

timfel commented May 4, 2015

There has been some work on and off in a few forks (adding ffi support and improving list performance), but no one currently has had time to work on it for a while.

@noraj
Copy link

noraj commented Jan 10, 2019

In early 2019, the domain name is dead:

$ drill @1.1.1.1 topazruby.com
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, rcode: NOERROR, id: 14240
;; flags: qr rd ra ; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;; topazruby.com.       IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:

;; Query time: 21 msec
;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1
;; WHEN: Thu Jan 10 16:50:35 2019
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 31

@kostya
Copy link
Contributor

kostya commented Jun 4, 2020

i added some benchmarks with little modified topaz version here: https://github.com/kostya/jit-benchmarks. Its nice to see, that topaz still very fast in most cases, between other ruby implementations, even if it not developed some years.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants