Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coveralls seems messy after changing Jenkins Job #126

Open
eolivelli opened this issue Feb 26, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Coveralls seems messy after changing Jenkins Job #126

eolivelli opened this issue Feb 26, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@eolivelli
Copy link

Hi,
While setting up Coveralls.io for Apache BookKeeper I created several Jobs on Apache Jenkins but now that the jenkins build number started from the beginning it seems there is some mess on Coveralls.io page

see
https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper

This is my last log in Build 2 of https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper_codecoverage/2/console


2018-02-26T13:53:47.560 [INFO] Successfully wrote Coveralls data in 638ms
2018-02-26T13:53:47.560 [INFO] Gathered code coverage metrics for 393 source files with 93032 lines of code:
2018-02-26T13:53:47.560 [INFO] - 31234 relevant lines
2018-02-26T13:53:47.560 [INFO] - 22588 covered lines
2018-02-26T13:53:47.560 [INFO] - 8646 missed lines
2018-02-26T13:53:47.560 [INFO] Submitting Coveralls data to API
2018-02-26T13:53:48.689 [INFO] Successfully submitted Coveralls data in 1129ms for Job #2.3
2018-02-26T13:53:48.689 [INFO] https://coveralls.io/jobs/34096866
2018-02-26T13:53:48.689 [INFO] *** It might take hours for Coveralls to update the actual coverage numbers for a job
2018-02-26T13:53:48.689 [INFO]     If you see question marks in the report, please be patient

My question is: is there any way to restart Coveralls report from scratch ? Should I drop "bookkeeper" from Coveralls.io and create a new project ?

Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant