feat(eslint-plugin): [prefer-optional-chain] support suggesting `!foo…

… || !foo.bar` as a valid match for the rule (#5594)

* feat/issue5245-negated-or-optional-chaining---fixed

* Not supported mixing with TSNonNullExpression

* complex computed properties

* CR fix comment on unsupported cases and remove TODO comments

* CR: Remove unreachable uncovered check

packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/prefer-optional-chain.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-description: 'Enforce using concise optional chain expressions instead of chained logical ands.'
+description: 'Enforce using concise optional chain expressions instead of chained logical ands, negated logical ors, or empty objects.'
 ---
 
 > 🛑 This file is source code, not the primary documentation location! 🛑
@@ -23,9 +23,15 @@ foo && foo.a && foo.a.b && foo.a.b.c;
 foo && foo['a'] && foo['a'].b && foo['a'].b.c;
 foo && foo.a && foo.a.b && foo.a.b.method && foo.a.b.method();
 
+// With empty objects
 (((foo || {}).a || {}).b || {}).c;
 (((foo || {})['a'] || {}).b || {}).c;
 
+// With negated `or`s
+!foo || !foo.bar;
+!foo || !foo[bar];
+!foo || !foo.bar || !foo.bar.baz || !foo.bar.baz();
+
 // this rule also supports converting chained strict nullish checks:
 foo &&
   foo.a != null &&
@@ -43,6 +49,10 @@ foo?.['a']?.b?.c;
 foo?.a?.b?.method?.();
 
 foo?.a?.b?.c?.d?.e;
+
+!foo?.bar;
+!foo?.[bar];
+!foo?.bar?.baz?.();
 ```
 
 <!--/tabs-->