Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(parser): improve scope-analysis types #1481

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jan 21, 2020
Merged

feat(parser): improve scope-analysis types #1481

merged 5 commits into from Jan 21, 2020

Conversation

armano2
Copy link
Member

@armano2 armano2 commented Jan 21, 2020 •
edited

Next part of removal of any from project

@typescript-eslint

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@armano2 armano2 self-assigned this Jan 21, 2020
bradzacher
bradzacher approved these changes Jan 21, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@bradzacher bradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks!

@bradzacher bradzacher changed the title test(parser): correct types in scope-analysis tools feat(parser): clean up scope-analysis types Jan 21, 2020
@bradzacher bradzacher added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 21, 2020
@bradzacher
Copy link
Member

sigh codecov is being broken again again

@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit 4a727fa into typescript-eslint:master Jan 21, 2020
@armano2 armano2 deleted the scope-types branch January 21, 2020 17:07
@armano2 armano2 changed the title feat(parser): clean up scope-analysis types feat(parser): improve scope-analysis types Jan 27, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@bradzacher bradzacher bradzacher approved these changes

Assignees

@armano2 armano2

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@armano2 @bradzacher