Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(eslint-plugin): [strict-boolean-expressions] add allow nullable enum to strict boolean expressions #6096

Conversation

kazizi55
Copy link
Contributor

@kazizi55 kazizi55 commented Nov 26, 2022

PR Checklist

Overview

Adds a new rule allowNullableEnum, in order to catch potential issues where one of the valid values of the Enum is falsy.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Nov 26, 2022

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit c19c528. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 47 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @kazizi55!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 26, 2022

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c19c528
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/63df0c8c385f1d0008547da1
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-6096--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #6096 (c19c528) into main (f330e06) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6096   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.52%   91.53%           
=======================================
  Files         371      371           
  Lines       12651    12662   +11     
  Branches     3717     3721    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        11579    11590   +11     
  Misses        754      754           
  Partials      318      318           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 91.53% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...int-plugin/src/rules/strict-boolean-expressions.ts 98.90% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

@kazizi55 kazizi55 changed the title feat(eslint-plugin): add allow nullable enum to strict boolean expressions feat(eslint-plugin): [strict-boolean-expressions] add allow nullable enum to strict boolean expressions Nov 27, 2022
@kazizi55 kazizi55 marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2022 07:36
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great so far, thanks! Requesting changes on simplifying the code a bit, splitting up tests, and adding docs. ✨

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Nov 27, 2022
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking excellent! ✨

Just the two small cleanups about comments and simplifying the types filtering. I'm happy to do those soon if you don't want to keep adjusting for my pestering 😄 - up to you.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Progress! 🚀

@bradzacher bradzacher removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Jan 19, 2023
@bradzacher
Copy link
Member

Need to address the lint failure

@bradzacher bradzacher added awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party enhancement: plugin rule option New rule option for an existing eslint-plugin rule labels Jan 30, 2023
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks for iterating on it with us! 🙌

The lint failure was a single test case so I just went ahead and fixed it. 🚢

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit d4747cd into typescript-eslint:main Feb 5, 2023
crapStone pushed a commit to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2 that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.50.0` -> `5.51.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2feslint-plugin/5.50.0/5.51.0) |
| [@typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.50.0` -> `5.51.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2fparser/5.50.0/5.51.0) |

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)</summary>

### [`v5.51.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5510-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5500v5510-2023-02-06)

[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.50.0...v5.51.0)

##### Bug Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[sort-type-constituents] fixed behavior change ([#&#8203;6384](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6384)) ([5bf7f7f](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@5bf7f7f)), closes [#&#8203;6339](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6339)
-   **eslint-plugin:** do not use .at(), Node 14 does not support it ([#&#8203;6402](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6402)) ([077ed1b](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@077ed1b))

##### Features

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[naming-convention] improve performance by removing unnecessary selectors ([#&#8203;6376](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6376)) ([3647a1c](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@3647a1c))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-floating-promises] error on logical expression ([#&#8203;6356](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6356)) ([f330e06](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@f330e06))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-import-type-side-effects] add rule to warn against runtime side effects with `verbatimModuleSyntax` ([#&#8203;6394](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6394)) ([b14d3be](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@b14d3be))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[strict-boolean-expressions] add allow nullable enum to strict boolean expressions ([#&#8203;6096](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6096)) ([d4747cd](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@d4747cd))

</details>

<details>
<summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser)</summary>

### [`v5.51.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/parser/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5510-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5500v5510-2023-02-06)

[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.50.0...v5.51.0)

**Note:** Version bump only for package [@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/parser)

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

 - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4xMjQuMyIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM0LjEyOC4zIn0=-->

Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1773
Reviewed-by: Epsilon_02 <epsilon_02@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party enhancement: plugin rule option New rule option for an existing eslint-plugin rule
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhancement: [@typescript-eslint/strict-boolean-expressions] allowNullableEnum option
3 participants