Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(eslint-plugin): [no-floating-promises] error on logical expression #6356

Conversation

islandryu
Copy link
Contributor

@islandryu islandryu commented Jan 20, 2023

PR Checklist

Overview

Promise in logical expression now also throws an error.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @islandryu!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jan 20, 2023

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit ab1bf4c. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 47 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 20, 2023

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ab1bf4c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/63dd15106ad3d1000815ce46
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-6356--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

const myPromise = async () => void 0;
const condition = true;

void (condition && myPromise());
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@islandryu islandryu changed the title feat(eslint-plugin) [no-floating-promises] Error on logical expression feat(eslint-plugin): [no-floating-promises] Error on logical expression Jan 20, 2023
@islandryu islandryu changed the title feat(eslint-plugin): [no-floating-promises] Error on logical expression feat(eslint-plugin): [no-floating-promises] error on logical expression Jan 20, 2023
@bradzacher bradzacher added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2023
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! Just fix the build failure and 🚀 let's ship.

I was on the fence as to whether the suggestions should put the await/void immediately in front of the specific promise, rather than outside the logical expression (i.e. a || (await b) rather than await (a || b). But since it's just suggestions, not auto-fixing, I think this is fine to keep the rule simpler.

packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-floating-promises.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval PR that a maintainer has LGTM'd - any maintainer can merge this when ready label Jan 31, 2023
@bradzacher bradzacher added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Feb 2, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6356 (ab1bf4c) into main (fc24a57) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6356   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.52%   91.52%           
=======================================
  Files         371      371           
  Lines       12649    12651    +2     
  Branches     3714     3717    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        11577    11579    +2     
+ Misses        755      754    -1     
- Partials      317      318    +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 91.52% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...es/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-floating-promises.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...es/eslint-plugin/src/util/getOperatorPrecedence.ts 42.85% <0.00%> (ø)

Co-authored-by: Josh Goldberg <git@joshuakgoldberg.com>
@islandryu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Build is cured!

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One teeeeny thing

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit f330e06 into typescript-eslint:main Feb 3, 2023
crapStone pushed a commit to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2 that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.50.0` -> `5.51.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2feslint-plugin/5.50.0/5.51.0) |
| [@typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.50.0` -> `5.51.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2fparser/5.50.0/5.51.0) |

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)</summary>

### [`v5.51.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5510-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5500v5510-2023-02-06)

[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.50.0...v5.51.0)

##### Bug Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[sort-type-constituents] fixed behavior change ([#&#8203;6384](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6384)) ([5bf7f7f](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@5bf7f7f)), closes [#&#8203;6339](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6339)
-   **eslint-plugin:** do not use .at(), Node 14 does not support it ([#&#8203;6402](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6402)) ([077ed1b](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@077ed1b))

##### Features

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[naming-convention] improve performance by removing unnecessary selectors ([#&#8203;6376](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6376)) ([3647a1c](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@3647a1c))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-floating-promises] error on logical expression ([#&#8203;6356](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6356)) ([f330e06](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@f330e06))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-import-type-side-effects] add rule to warn against runtime side effects with `verbatimModuleSyntax` ([#&#8203;6394](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6394)) ([b14d3be](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@b14d3be))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[strict-boolean-expressions] add allow nullable enum to strict boolean expressions ([#&#8203;6096](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6096)) ([d4747cd](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@d4747cd))

</details>

<details>
<summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser)</summary>

### [`v5.51.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/parser/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5510-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5500v5510-2023-02-06)

[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.50.0...v5.51.0)

**Note:** Version bump only for package [@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/parser)

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

 - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4xMjQuMyIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM0LjEyOC4zIn0=-->

Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1773
Reviewed-by: Epsilon_02 <epsilon_02@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval PR that a maintainer has LGTM'd - any maintainer can merge this when ready awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-floating-promises] Not marking as error when combined with a logical operator variable
3 participants