Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
-
This seems like it would be up to the Journal publishers, not Typst. Given the pressure for years to improve their submission workflows I doubt this will be easy. I suspect only a large amount of pressure from authors will sway the needle. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I don't think journals will accept Typst submissions before it has reached stability and is reasonably feature-complete. Additionally, I don't think it is wise to push for Typst support before that point, else they will just get tired and trust will be more difficult to build up. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Most journals don't even accept manuscripts requiring LuaTeX instead of pdfTeX, so I don't imagine it'll happen quickly. It would at least be a few years after typst reaches a stable state. Academic publishing moves slowly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A practical way may be to convert the Typst file to a LaTeX file and submit that LaTeX file. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I believe that the number of users of
typst
will increase significantly, when it becomes available in the submission systems of journal publishers (such as Elsevier). So, is typst official or some other organisation pushing for this now? How much further is there to go?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions