Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better Completion Suggestions (sort by frequency) #860

Open
TippyLion28 opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Better Completion Suggestions (sort by frequency) #860

TippyLion28 opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
1-feature-request ✨ Issue type: Request for a desirable, nice-to-have feature

Comments

@TippyLion28
Copy link

Note: Per the contribution guidelines, deleting parts of the template or not filling in vital information may result in the issue to be immediately closed as invalid.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have enabled completion with the hope that it would accelerate my typing but the suggestions appear to be sorted alphabetically rather than by frequency which reduces the usefulness of completion.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like the words to be sorted in some kind of useful order like frequency (i.e. How often the word is used in spoken/written language)

Describe alternatives you've considered
Long shot but maybe some basic markov chain could be used, as is common on smartphone keyboards

Additional context
N/A and thank you for the brilliant extension

@TippyLion28 TippyLion28 added the 1-feature-request ✨ Issue type: Request for a desirable, nice-to-have feature label Nov 6, 2023
@TippyLion28
Copy link
Author

Side question: why does ltex recommend

  • outcamostatations
  • outdabigatranativeness
  • polyspermicativeness

and...

  • disestablishmentarianismativeness

...as autocomplete candidates? 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1-feature-request ✨ Issue type: Request for a desirable, nice-to-have feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant