-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix behavior when revisiting an intercepted route #59168
Merged
ztanner
merged 1 commit into
canary
from
12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route
Dec 1, 2023
Merged
fix behavior when revisiting an intercepted route #59168
ztanner
merged 1 commit into
canary
from
12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route
Dec 1, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ijjk
added
area: tests
created-by: Next.js team
PRs by the Next.js team
type: next
labels
Dec 1, 2023
Current dependencies on/for this PR: This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. |
Stats from current PRDefault BuildGeneral Overall increase
|
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 10.6s | 10.7s | |
buildDurationCached | 6s | 6.7s | |
nodeModulesSize | 199 MB | 199 MB | |
nextStartRea..uration (ms) | 420ms | 426ms | N/A |
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
199-HASH.js gzip | 30.7 kB | 30.8 kB | N/A |
3f784ff6-HASH.js gzip | 53.3 kB | 53.3 kB | ✓ |
494.HASH.js gzip | 180 B | 181 B | N/A |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 45.2 kB | 45.2 kB | ✓ |
main-app-HASH.js gzip | 242 B | 241 B | N/A |
main-HASH.js gzip | 31.7 kB | 31.7 kB | N/A |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.7 kB | 1.7 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 100 kB | 100 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 194 B | 195 B | N/A |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 182 B | 181 B | N/A |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 501 B | 503 B | N/A |
css-HASH.js gzip | 322 B | 323 B | N/A |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.5 kB | 2.5 kB | ✓ |
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip | 253 B | 255 B | N/A |
head-HASH.js gzip | 348 B | 347 B | N/A |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 369 B | 368 B | N/A |
image-HASH.js gzip | 4.27 kB | 4.27 kB | N/A |
index-HASH.js gzip | 256 B | 256 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.61 kB | 2.6 kB | N/A |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 311 B | 311 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 384 B | 383 B | N/A |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 307 B | 308 B | N/A |
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip | 106 B | 106 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 3.17 kB | 3.17 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 484 B | 483 B | N/A |
Overall change | 0 B | 0 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 527 B | 527 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 539 B | 541 B | N/A |
withRouter.html gzip | 524 B | 523 B | N/A |
Overall change | 527 B | 527 B | ✓ |
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
edge-ssr.js gzip | 92.6 kB | 92.6 kB | N/A |
page.js gzip | 145 kB | 145 kB | N/A |
Overall change | 0 B | 0 B | ✓ |
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
middleware-b..fest.js gzip | 625 B | 625 B | ✓ |
middleware-r..fest.js gzip | 150 B | 151 B | N/A |
middleware.js gzip | 35.7 kB | 35.7 kB | ✓ |
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip | 1.92 kB | 1.92 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 38.3 kB | 38.3 kB | ✓ |
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary | vercel/next.js 12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip | 168 kB | 168 kB | ✓ |
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip | 93.8 kB | 93.8 kB | ✓ |
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip | 94.5 kB | 94.5 kB | ✓ |
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip | 89.1 kB | 89.1 kB | ✓ |
app-page.run...dev.js gzip | 138 kB | 138 kB | ✓ |
app-page.run..prod.js gzip | 88.4 kB | 88.4 kB | ✓ |
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip | 24.2 kB | 24.2 kB | ✓ |
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip | 16.8 kB | 16.8 kB | ✓ |
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip | 16.9 kB | 16.9 kB | ✓ |
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip | 16.4 kB | 16.4 kB | ✓ |
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip | 23.6 kB | 23.6 kB | ✓ |
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip | 16.4 kB | 16.4 kB | ✓ |
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip | 9.37 kB | 9.37 kB | ✓ |
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip | 9.64 kB | 9.64 kB | ✓ |
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip | 9.37 kB | 9.37 kB | ✓ |
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip | 21.9 kB | 21.9 kB | ✓ |
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip | 22.6 kB | 22.6 kB | ✓ |
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip | 21.9 kB | 21.9 kB | ✓ |
server.runti..prod.js gzip | 49.3 kB | 49.3 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 930 kB | 930 kB | ✓ |
Diff details
Diff for 199-HASH.js
Diff too large to display
ztanner
requested review from
timneutkens,
ijjk,
shuding,
huozhi,
feedthejim and
wyattjoh
as code owners
December 1, 2023 16:32
feedthejim
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2023
ztanner
deleted the
12-01-fix_behavior_when_revisiting_an_intercepted_route
branch
December 1, 2023 16:54
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
When using rewrites, in the scenario where a user visits an intercepted route, reloads the page, goes back, and then revisits the same route, we serve the page rather than the intercepted route.
Why?
#59094 fixed the case where
ACTION_RESTORE
was not restoringnextUrl
properly. However there's a separate issue where when theSERVER_PATCH
action comes in,handleMutable
attempts to computenextUrl
by comparing the patched tree with the current tree. In the case of the popstate event, both trees are the same, so the logic is currently configured to fallback tocanonicalUrl
, which is not the correct URL to use in the case of rewrites.How?
If the computed changed path is null, we should only fallback to using
canonicalUrl
if we don't have a validnextUrl
that we can use.Closes NEXT-1747
Fixes #56072