Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 14, 2018. It is now read-only.

Get rid of Jade, use something different #38

Open
borekb opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Get rid of Jade, use something different #38

borekb opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 0 comments
Milestone
Around-4.0 Improv...

Comments

@borekb
Copy link
Member

borekb commented Feb 2, 2016

Possible improvement: we don't really like Jade with its significant whitespace for HTML. There are other view engines (myriads of them) as well, we might swap it one day.
@borekb borekb added this to the Improvements milestone Feb 2, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Around-4.0 Improvements
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@borekb