Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: fast-refresh explain link #97

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 28, 2023
Merged

fix: fast-refresh explain link #97

merged 1 commit into from Jan 28, 2023

Conversation

sapphi-red
Copy link
Member

Description

The link to the fast-refresh explanation was wrong.

Additional context

What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • New Feature
  • Documentation update
  • Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the PR Title Convention.
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
  • Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

@sapphi-red sapphi-red added p1-chore 🧹 Doesn't change code behavior (priority) p2-has-workaround 🍰 Bug, but has workaround (priority) and removed p1-chore 🧹 Doesn't change code behavior (priority) labels Jan 28, 2023
@ArnaudBarre ArnaudBarre merged commit 6097795 into main Jan 28, 2023
@ArnaudBarre ArnaudBarre deleted the fix/fast-refresh-explain-link branch January 28, 2023 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ArnaudBarre ArnaudBarre ArnaudBarre approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
p2-has-workaround 🍰 Bug, but has workaround (priority)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@sapphi-red @ArnaudBarre