Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: sourcemapIgnoreList for optimizedDeps #12633

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

patak-dev
Copy link
Member

Description

Fixes #12630

Reference


What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • New Feature
  • Documentation update
  • Other

@stackblitz
Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Mar 28, 2023

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@patak-dev patak-dev added the p3-minor-bug An edge case that only affects very specific usage (priority) label Mar 28, 2023
await loadOptimizedDep(sourcemapPath, depsOptimizer),
) as SourceMap

applySourcemapIgnoreList(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of rewriting the sourcemap when serving it, wouldn't it make sense to consider the ignore list predicate when initially generating the optimized dep?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought about it, but we don't have the .map in memory to modify it. See #12622, we needed to go back to let esbuild write the files to disk directly because there was a perf regression.
We would also need to start using sourcemapIgnoreList.toString() in the hash key for optimization given our current architecture. That could work though.

If we want to do it, I think we should still do it lazily to avoid blocking giving the optimized deps to the browser. But that means that if the process is stopped, we may end up with inconsistent results.

So I see three options:
a. Current approach in this PR, and we accept the JSON.parse/JSON.stringify cost (I think this could be fine)
b. Current approach, but we don't use JSON.parse/JSON.stringify and instead use regexes to grab the sources array and then inject after it the ignoreSourcemapList.
c. We add sourcemapIgnoreList to the deps cache key, and when we do the first JSON.parse, we also add a marker like "__vite": "sourcemapIgnorList_done",. So next time we load it, we can use a regex to know it has been processed.

Leaning towards b. if there is a regression perf after this PR. cc @bluwy @sapphi-red

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My opinion is to go with "a." for now because I guess this is not a hot path.

One more option would be to create a feature request / PR to esbuild for adding sourcemap ignore list feature.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. I'd also heavily lean towards "a." unless there's a serious performance problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p3-minor-bug An edge case that only affects very specific usage (priority)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Source files are not ignored with sourcemapIgnoreList setting configured
3 participants