Non-deterministic build #13672

ttionya · 2023-06-29T05:47:14Z

Describe the bug

Executing builds multiple times with the same code generates different hashes.

Reproduction

https://github.com/ttionya/vite-non-deterministic-build-repro

Steps to reproduce

Clone the aforementioned repro, install dependencies, and execute npm run build multiple times. Verify the hash of the vendor file.

System Info

System:                                                    
    OS: Windows 10 10.0.19045                                
    CPU: (8) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10510U CPU @ 1.80GHz   
    Memory: 3.92 GB / 15.76 GB                               
  Binaries:
    Node: 14.21.0
    npm: 9.6.7
  Browsers:
    Edge: Spartan (44.19041.1266.0), Chromium (114.0.1823.58)
    Internet Explorer: 11.0.19041.1566
  npmPackages:
    @vitejs/plugin-legacy: ^4.0.0 => 4.0.1 
    @vitejs/plugin-vue2: ^2.2.0 => 2.2.0 
    @vitejs/plugin-vue2-jsx: ^1.1.0 => 1.1.0 
    vite: ^4.3.8 => 4.3.8

Used Package Manager

npm

Logs

No response

Validations

Follow our Code of Conduct
Read the Contributing Guidelines.
Read the docs.
Check that there isn't already an issue that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.
Make sure this is a Vite issue and not a framework-specific issue. For example, if it's a Vue SFC related bug, it should likely be reported to vuejs/core instead.
Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A open a GitHub Discussion or join our Discord Chat Server.
The provided reproduction is a minimal reproducible example of the bug.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

ttionya · 2023-06-29T06:00:39Z

I'm aware of two similar issues. One is #11911, but it is unrelated to this issue. The other one #13071 might be relevant, but even after commenting on it 10 days ago, I haven't received any response. Therefore, I have created a new issue and provided a reproducible repository.

ttionya · 2023-06-29T06:01:53Z

I have written a plugin that prints all the parameters in the transform hook. During two consecutive builds, although the order of their outputs is different, I found that there is only one instance where the content of the output differs after adjusting the order.

plugins: [
    function() {
      return {
        name: 'test',
        transform: (...args) => {
          console.log(args)
        }
      }
    }()
]

I have removed a significant amount of irrelevant code, so the hash of the artifact is different from the one in the repro.

First build:

[
  'export { __moduleExports as default } from "C:/Users/admin/Projects/My/vite-non-deterministic-build-repro/node_modules/dayjs/dayjs.min.js";',
  '\x00C:/Users/admin/Projects/My/vite-non-deterministic-build-repro/node_modules/dayjs/dayjs.min.js?commonjs-proxy'
]

�[2mdist/�[22m�[36massets/index-e2988d1d.js   �[39m�[1m�[2m 1.10 kB�[22m�[1m�[22m�[2m │ gzip:  0.63 kB�[22m
�[2mdist/�[22m�[36massets/vendor-3bedaa96.js  �[39m�[1m�[2m81.22 kB�[22m�[1m�[22m�[2m │ gzip: 32.73 kB�[22m
�[32m✓ built in 1.97s�[39m

Second build:

[
  'import { getDefaultExportFromCjs } from "\x00commonjsHelpers.js";\n' +
    'import { __require as requireDayjs_min } from "C:/Users/admin/Projects/My/vite-non-deterministic-build-repro/node_modules/dayjs/dayjs.min.js";\n' +
    'var dayjs_minExports = requireDayjs_min();\n' +
    'export { dayjs_minExports as __moduleExports };export default /*@__PURE__*/getDefaultExportFromCjs(dayjs_minExports);',
  '\x00C:/Users/admin/Projects/My/vite-non-deterministic-build-repro/node_modules/dayjs/dayjs.min.js?commonjs-es-import'
]

�[2mdist/�[22m�[36massets/index-73275ff8.js   �[39m�[1m�[2m 1.10 kB�[22m�[1m�[22m�[2m │ gzip:  0.63 kB�[22m
�[2mdist/�[22m�[36massets/vendor-2f895bab.js  �[39m�[1m�[2m81.26 kB�[22m�[1m�[22m�[2m │ gzip: 32.75 kB�[22m
�[32m✓ built in 2.97s�[39m

iamriajul · 2023-10-03T14:18:10Z

Facing the same issue! waiting for a fix.

derheld42 · 2023-10-06T01:44:33Z

I'm seeing this issue as well.

jmsmtn · 2023-10-06T14:04:02Z

The workaround mentioned in #10506, setting maxParallelFileOps: 1, has seemed to resolve this for me.

derheld42 · 2023-10-06T20:01:40Z

The workaround in #10506 doesn't seem to work for me. I created a repo to try testing the workaround using the basic out-of-the-box base sveltekit app. Test repo is here https://github.com/derheld42/repro-vite-10506

bluwy · 2023-10-29T13:27:14Z

Seems like dayjs is seen as commonjs, and there's a related upstream bug: rollup/plugins#1425

Thanks for the simple repro (and sorry for not responding in the other issue). Got a few issues to juggle, but I'll try to check this deeper now to see if there's something that can be fixed.

Also as explained in the upstream issue, the workaround would be:

export default defineConfig({
  build: {
    commonjsOptions: {
      strictRequires: true
    }
  }
})

vitejs/vite#13672 (comment) Still fails producing a deterministic build: npm run build mv build build1 npm run build diff -qr build build1

derheld42 · 2023-10-29T19:16:18Z

I tried the workaround in the above comment and it didn't create a deterministic build for me. I also tested it with derheld42/repro-vite-10506@a31754f and it doesn't produce a deterministic build.

bluwy · 2023-10-30T03:11:37Z

@derheld42 that seems to be a SvelteKit specific issue: sveltejs/kit#8948

You can fix it with:

const config = {
	kit: {
		version: {
			name: 'test' // something stable instead of default `Date.now()`
		}
	}
};

ttionya · 2023-10-30T07:05:13Z

After adding strictRequires option for the repro, it consistently generates a deterministic hash on every build, which looks great.

After adding the strictRequires option to my larger project, the significant build differences that existed previously have disappeared, except for the polyfill-legacy-[hash].js (generated by @vitejs/plugin-legacy). I spent some time trying to find a way to reproduce the instability in building the polyfill, but unfortunately, I failed. It appears that it doesn't stem from a singular syntax, so despite numerous attempts, I couldn't yield any results. I'm aware that a simple description won't be of any help in troubleshooting the issue, so this is just a record for now. Perhaps, if I manage to find a way to reproduce it in the future, I'll return to provide an update.

derheld42 · 2023-10-30T17:18:01Z

@derheld42 that seems to be a SvelteKit specific issue: sveltejs/kit#8948

You can fix it with:
const config = {
	kit: {
		version: {
			name: 'test' // something stable instead of default `Date.now()`
		}
	}
};

Yes - that worked to make the built files deterministic - thank you!

iamriajul · 2023-10-30T17:31:30Z

I'm also facing the same issue, strictRequires didn't work for me.

Here is my dependencies, can anyone give me any hint which is causing this.

  "devDependencies": {
    "@builder.io/qwik": "^1.2.15",
    "@builder.io/qwik-city": "^1.2.15",
    "@fastify/compress": "^6.2.1",
    "@fastify/http-proxy": "^9.2.1",
    "@fastify/static": "^6.10.1",
    "@fullhuman/postcss-purgecss": "^5.0.0",
    "@types/eslint": "8.44.1",
    "@types/js-cookie": "^3.0.4",
    "@types/lodash": "^4.14.199",
    "@types/node": "^20.4.5",
    "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "6.2.0",
    "@typescript-eslint/parser": "6.2.0",
    "autoprefixer": "^10.4.14",
    "country-flag-icons": "^1.5.7",
    "cssnano": "^6.0.1",
    "eslint": "8.45.0",
    "eslint-plugin-qwik": "^1.2.12",
    "fastify": "^4.17.0",
    "fastify-plugin": "^4.5.0",
    "postcss": "8.4.27",
    "postcss-import": "^15.1.0",
    "postcss-nested": "^6.0.1",
    "prettier": "3.0.0",
    "purgecss": "^5.0.0",
    "tailwindcss": "3.3.3",
    "tw-elements": "1.0.0-alpha13",
    "typescript": "5.1.6",
    "undici": "5.22.1",
    "vite": "4.4.7",
    "vite-plugin-static-copy": "^0.17.0",
    "vite-plugin-thumbhash-base64": "^0.0.2",
    "vite-tsconfig-paths": "4.2.0"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "@fontsource-variable/dm-sans": "^5.0.3",
    "@fontsource/dm-sans": "^5.0.14",
    "@iconscout/unicons": "^4.0.8",
    "@modular-forms/qwik": "^0.21.0",
    "@svgx/vite-plugin-qwik": "^1.0.1",
    "animate.css": "^4.1.1",
    "date-fns": "^2.30.0",
    "dayjs": "^1.11.10",
    "flowbite": "^1.8.1",
    "js-base64": "^3.7.5",
    "js-cookie": "^3.0.5",
    "libphonenumber-js": "^1.10.47",
    "lodash": "^4.17.21",
    "moick-qwik-fixed": "^1.0.6",
    "qwik-content-loader": "^0.0.2",
    "qwik-scroll-to-top": "^0.0.7",
    "qwik-select-fixed": "^0.0.4",
    "valibot": "^0.19.0",
    "zod": "^3.22.4"
  }

mikethea1 · 2023-12-04T13:52:43Z

We're having this issue as well (even with the workarounds I've seen listed) which is very frustrating. Will this be addressed soon?

Here is our vite.config.js; I welcome any suggestions for additional things to try:


import { defineConfig } from 'vite';
import laravel from 'laravel-vite-plugin';
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react';

export default defineConfig({
    plugins: [
        laravel({
            input: ['resources/js/app.tsx'],
            refresh: true,
        }),
        react(),
    ],
    build: {
        rollupOptions: {
            // Suggested here for DETERMINISTIC BUILD: https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/10506 (from https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/13672)
            maxParallelFileOps: 1,
        },
        // Suggested here for DETERMINISTIC BUILD: https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/13672#issuecomment-1784110536
        commonjsOptions: {
            strictRequires: true
        }
    }
});

rkhaslarov · 2024-02-22T14:32:22Z

facing the issue with the react component that is not chaging at all, but hash is new all the time

ilyagr · 2024-02-23T06:41:46Z

I have a pretty detailed example in #15994.

It seems that the suggestions in this thread helped. I'm guessing that it was the CommonJS strictRequires: true that helped, mainly because my project is using CodemIrror5 which, AFAIK, is a complex CommonJS package.

niksy · 2024-03-08T11:41:17Z

Solutions mentioned here didn’t work for me. Each consecutive build without changes to source code produces new hashes for the same chunks and in some cases can lead to cascading cache invalidation issues which is really bad for performance.

mikethea1 · 2024-03-08T12:56:19Z

Each consecutive build without changes to source code produces new hashes for the same chunks and in some cases can lead to cascading cache invalidation issues which is really bad for performance

We're seeing the exact same thing. Why wouldn't the hashes just be based solely on the content of the file being hashed? Or is the issue that there is non-determinism in the bundling process which makes for different content every time?

niksy · 2024-03-08T19:08:41Z

Or is the issue that there is non-determinism in the bundling process which makes for different content every time?

I think this is the main reason for this, and it seems like it should be fixed with build.commonjsOptions.strictRequires = true, but it isn’t.

msorens · 2024-03-22T23:44:18Z

I have tried adding both workarounds to my code (strictRequires: true and maxParallelFileOps: 1) but neither helped; I am still seeing the same problem as others have noted here.

But here is a fun fact that may help someone isolate the cause further:
(a) when I run vite build locally on my Mac then it works correctly--if I run it a second time, the hash is always the same!
(b) when I run in CI (we are using https://concourse-ci.org/) then the problem always occurs (but just for my JS files; I am getting constant hashes for my CSS files). The CSS files are quite a bit smaller than the JS files, which perhaps makes a difference.
vite: version 4.5.2
rollup: version 3.29.4

geoffharcourt · 2024-04-04T03:00:05Z

~~@msorens we are seeing the same behavior you are: deterministic results locally on a Mac, different hashes in CI, but only non-deterministic for JS outputs, CSS is consistent.~~

For us the issue turned out to be the Sentry Vite plugin's default behavior, which injects a helper method that makes the build result non-deterministic.

devsuperfrete · 2024-04-04T12:07:13Z

Analyzing the code a bit, I understood that this happens because the name of the index file changes, and it is imported in almost all other .js files. So, for the hash to work correctly, I imagine that this needs to be ignored in some way.

rkhaslarov · 2024-04-04T12:58:57Z

@devsuperfrete yes also mentioned that, if something is change at any place all hashes are affected, the reason is that everything included into index

yoyo837 · 2024-04-07T07:33:34Z

Same here. strictRequires: true doesn't work for us. And we urgently hope this issue can be resolved ASAP.

I found that the export order is different every time, which causes the difference, but I don't know how to fix it.

msorens · 2024-04-09T15:37:21Z

@geoffharcourt For us the issue turned out to be the Sentry Vite plugin's default behavior, which injects a helper method that makes the build result non-deterministic.

Could you share some more info on this? Looks like my code base uses that plugin. How/where did you find info about that injected helper method?

geoffharcourt · 2024-04-09T19:41:06Z

Hi @msorens this was painful for us, but we found this option and set it to false: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@sentry/vite-plugin#releaseinject

msorens · 2024-04-09T23:06:03Z

Thanks, @geoffharcourt , I will give that a try. Not terribly familiar with Sentry: what is the impact of setting that option to false? Seems like it might not be able to manage builds as effectively...?

geoffharcourt · 2024-04-09T23:11:07Z

Thanks, @geoffharcourt , I will give that a try. Not terribly familiar with Sentry: what is the impact of setting that option to false? Seems like it might not be able to manage builds as effectively...?

It helps Sentry link exceptions to source. We found in our app that Sentry was still able to do it well without the helper injected.

dasJ · 2024-04-10T07:48:31Z

We had the same issue with SvelteKit. They generate a version that is based on the current timestamp (which is something they discourage in their docs).
Overriding the version as explained in their docs fixed the issue for us, even with the Sentry plugin's default config.

shankerwangmiao · 2024-04-23T04:59:31Z

After adding strictRequires option for the repro, it consistently generates a deterministic hash on every build, which looks great.

After adding the strictRequires option to my larger project, the significant build differences that existed previously have disappeared, except for the polyfill-legacy-[hash].js (generated by @vitejs/plugin-legacy). I spent some time trying to find a way to reproduce the instability in building the polyfill, but unfortunately, I failed. It appears that it doesn't stem from a singular syntax, so despite numerous attempts, I couldn't yield any results. I'm aware that a simple description won't be of any help in troubleshooting the issue, so this is just a record for now. Perhaps, if I manage to find a way to reproduce it in the future, I'll return to provide an update.

Hi, I also met this where the generated polyfill bundle is not stable. I've opened the #16505, hopefully solving your problem.

ouksal · 2024-04-30T04:09:50Z

@derheld42 that seems to be a SvelteKit specific issue: sveltejs/kit#8948
You can fix it with:
const config = {
	kit: {
		version: {
			name: 'test' // something stable instead of default `Date.now()`
		}
	}
};
Yes - that worked to make the built files deterministic - thank you!

Worked. Thank you!

ttionya added the pending triage label Jun 29, 2023

bluwy added bug: upstream Bug in a dependency of Vite p3-minor-bug An edge case that only affects very specific usage (priority) feat: commonjs @rollup/plugin-commonjs issue and removed pending triage labels Oct 29, 2023

bluwy mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2023

Getting different hashes when running build on the same files #13071

Closed

7 tasks

derheld42 added a commit to derheld42/repro-vite-10506 that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2023

Testing workaround using strictRequires

a31754f

vitejs/vite#13672 (comment) Still fails producing a deterministic build: npm run build mv build build1 npm run build diff -qr build build1

sapphi-red mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2023

vite builds the same code, there will be product inconsistencies #14466

Closed

7 tasks

shankerwangmiao mentioned this issue Apr 23, 2024

fix(legacy): improve deterministic build of the polyfill bundle by sorting the polyfills discovered by babel #16505

Closed

shankerwangmiao mentioned this issue Apr 30, 2024

fix(legacy): improve deterministic build of the polyfill bundle by sorting the polyfills discovered by babel #16566

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Non-deterministic build #13672

Non-deterministic build #13672

ttionya commented Jun 29, 2023

ttionya commented Jun 29, 2023

ttionya commented Jun 29, 2023

iamriajul commented Oct 3, 2023

derheld42 commented Oct 6, 2023

jmsmtn commented Oct 6, 2023

derheld42 commented Oct 6, 2023

bluwy commented Oct 29, 2023 •

edited

derheld42 commented Oct 29, 2023

bluwy commented Oct 30, 2023

ttionya commented Oct 30, 2023

derheld42 commented Oct 30, 2023 •

edited

iamriajul commented Oct 30, 2023

mikethea1 commented Dec 4, 2023

rkhaslarov commented Feb 22, 2024

ilyagr commented Feb 23, 2024

niksy commented Mar 8, 2024

mikethea1 commented Mar 8, 2024

niksy commented Mar 8, 2024

msorens commented Mar 22, 2024 •

edited

geoffharcourt commented Apr 4, 2024 •

edited

devsuperfrete commented Apr 4, 2024

rkhaslarov commented Apr 4, 2024

yoyo837 commented Apr 7, 2024 •

edited

msorens commented Apr 9, 2024

geoffharcourt commented Apr 9, 2024

msorens commented Apr 9, 2024

geoffharcourt commented Apr 9, 2024

dasJ commented Apr 10, 2024

shankerwangmiao commented Apr 23, 2024

ouksal commented Apr 30, 2024

Non-deterministic build #13672

Non-deterministic build #13672

Comments

ttionya commented Jun 29, 2023

Describe the bug

Reproduction

Steps to reproduce

System Info

Used Package Manager

Logs

Validations

ttionya commented Jun 29, 2023

ttionya commented Jun 29, 2023

iamriajul commented Oct 3, 2023

derheld42 commented Oct 6, 2023

jmsmtn commented Oct 6, 2023

derheld42 commented Oct 6, 2023

bluwy commented Oct 29, 2023 • edited

derheld42 commented Oct 29, 2023

bluwy commented Oct 30, 2023

ttionya commented Oct 30, 2023

derheld42 commented Oct 30, 2023 • edited

iamriajul commented Oct 30, 2023

mikethea1 commented Dec 4, 2023

rkhaslarov commented Feb 22, 2024

ilyagr commented Feb 23, 2024

niksy commented Mar 8, 2024

mikethea1 commented Mar 8, 2024

niksy commented Mar 8, 2024

msorens commented Mar 22, 2024 • edited

geoffharcourt commented Apr 4, 2024 • edited

devsuperfrete commented Apr 4, 2024

rkhaslarov commented Apr 4, 2024

yoyo837 commented Apr 7, 2024 • edited

msorens commented Apr 9, 2024

geoffharcourt commented Apr 9, 2024

msorens commented Apr 9, 2024

geoffharcourt commented Apr 9, 2024

dasJ commented Apr 10, 2024

shankerwangmiao commented Apr 23, 2024

ouksal commented Apr 30, 2024

bluwy commented Oct 29, 2023 •

edited

derheld42 commented Oct 30, 2023 •

edited

msorens commented Mar 22, 2024 •

edited

geoffharcourt commented Apr 4, 2024 •

edited

yoyo837 commented Apr 7, 2024 •

edited