Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Hibernate 6 #401

Closed
120011676 opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Add support for Hibernate 6 #401

120011676 opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@120011676
Copy link

120011676 commented Mar 7, 2022

Is Hibernate 6 supported?

@vladmihalcea vladmihalcea changed the title hibernate 6 not support? Add support for Hibernate 6 Mar 7, 2022
@vladmihalcea
Copy link
Owner

Hibernate 6 is in development. Once it reached the 6.0 version, a new module will be added to add support for Hibernate 6.

If you are in a hurry, you can provide a Pull Request for it. You don't have to wait for me to add it. That's the beauty of open-source.

@jwgmeligmeyling
Copy link
Contributor

jwgmeligmeyling commented Apr 2, 2022

6.0 was released yesterday. I hope to give it a spin any time soon for jwgmeligmeyling/hibernate-types-querydsl-apt anyway. I still have to look into the user type system. I believe the type system changed quite heavily, but the release notes seem to suggest otherwise, so I guess it remains to be seen. I'll contribute any of my works back if anyone doesn't get to it before me 😄

@vladmihalcea
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the heads up

vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
@vladmihalcea vladmihalcea added this to the 2.15.0 milestone Apr 6, 2022
vladmihalcea added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2022
@vladmihalcea
Copy link
Owner

Fixed.

@jwgmeligmeyling
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome! 👍🏻

@vladmihalcea
Copy link
Owner

vladmihalcea commented Apr 6, 2022

@jwgmeligmeyling I managed to find a way to retain the old behavior that makes it so much easier to provide a single type rather than setting the JavaType and JdbcType separately. All in all, it looks good for the first 6.0 integration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants