Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review the representation of SCORVoc in popular editors #27

Open
np00 opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Review the representation of SCORVoc in popular editors #27

np00 opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@np00
Copy link

np00 commented Apr 13, 2016

As it seems, Protege has some issued when importing SCORVoc. This should be solved, even though it might not a problem the ontology but of Protege. The acceptance of that tool justifies a review. Same maybe for TopRaid.

@np00
Copy link
Author

np00 commented Jun 6, 2016

It seems that for properties which have multiple classes defined as a domain using owl:unionOf, a new identifier is generated, such as "genid-nodeid-xxx". Example:

 rdfs:domain [owl:unionOf (
        scor:SSPScheduleProductDeliveries
        scor:SMOPScheduleProductDeliveries
        scor:SEOPScheduleProductDeliveries
        )] ;

Unfortunately, besides the rather strange looking id, none of these classes are listed, so that users don't see them at all. Only if they look up the passage in the source code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant