Replies: 11 comments 46 replies
-
|
Interesting! I always go for creating a child component when I see repetition and while reading the problem I intuitively thought of solving it that way. But having multiple templates in order to reuse them inside a SFC looks amazing. I am thinking that this way of doing it, wouldn't require a new instance to be created right? Because if a new instance is created, then I guess there is no need to do that, we could just create a child component. So in terms of optimizations, having this way of reusing templates, would probably result in fewer component instances in userland. Thinking of logical concerns, this can align well I believe. Think for example: <script setup>
const count = ref(0)
function increase() {
count.value++
}
const user = ref({ name: 'Roland' })
function clear() {
user.value = { name: '' }
}
</script>
<template name="count">
Count is: {{ count }}
<button @click="increase">Increase</button>
</template>
<template name="user">
User name is: {{ user.name }}
<button @click="clear">Clear</button>
</template>
<template>
<div>
<template is="count"></template>
<hr />
<template is="user"></template>
</div>
</template> |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
While I don't mind using jsx or components. This seems like a good idea I was thinking about a similar api they are called blocks. A block is just a template just like any other but then you could reference it using component. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🎉 Beta version released as |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Rolanddoda Yeah but @sxzz 's implementation shows a different scenario/use case. I was not sure tbh so I asked to be sure |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@HassanZahirnia yeah always good to ask. Can you please elaborate on how the scenario is different? From what I see, you can have multiple templates and reuse them inside the "main" template. One thing that I don't see in the docs of that link above, is the ability to have slots or any kind of dynamic behavior. Everything looks static. @sxzz is it in the plan to add dynamic behavior by slots? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah you're right! Tbh the example used to introduce this feature was a bit unusual for me 😅 Maybe you could not use <miniTemplate name="title">
<div class="text-xl">
<slot />
</div>
</miniTemplate>This way it's distinguishable from the main |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@HassanZahirnia yeah the syntax will be bloated with many If I could suggest a better syntax, this is what comes to my mind right now: <script setup>
const count = ref(0)
function increase() {
count.value++
}
const user = ref({ name: 'Roland' })
function clear() {
user.value = { name: '' }
}
</script>
<unit name="count">
Count is: {{ count }}
<button @click="increase">Increase</button>
</unit>
<unit name="user">
User name is: {{ user.name }}
<button @click="clear">Clear</button>
</unit>
<template>
<div>
<unit is="count"></unit>
<hr />
<unit is="user"></unit>
</div>
</template>Haven't added something for @sxzz thoughts? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think using
I think static behavior is enough for now, so I may implement the dynamic version in the future, or PR welcomed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
For this feature to really shine, you would have to give the possibility to pass context to that template. What do I mean by this? For example, you have to show 2-3 different templates inside a v-for, but you have to show them in different conditions and with different data structures. If we can have this, it means that we can also have the possibility to pass around this templates in order to be reused in other components. <script setup>
const users = ref([
{name: 'a', lastname: 1, onlyName: true},
{name: 'b', lastname: 2, onlyName: true},
{name: 'b', lastname: 3, onlyName: false},
]);
</script>
<v-template #userCard1 let-user>
User name is: {{ user.name }}
</v-template >
<v-template #userCard2 let-user>
User last name is: {{ user.lastName }}
</v-template>
<template>
<div v-for="user in users">
<v-template-outlet v-if="user.onlyName" :template="userCard1" :context="user"></v-template-outlet>
<v-template-outlet v-if="!user.onlyName" :template="userCard2" :context="user"></v-template-outlet>
</div>
</template>The idea is taken from Angular (ng-template, ng-template-outlet ) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I like this idea It's simply additive and it does not destroy any other mechanisms of Vue. However, I'd change the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Reference slots<script setup>
const users = ref([
{name: 'a', lastname: 1, onlyName: true},
{name: 'b', lastname: 2, onlyName: true},
{name: 'b', lastname: 3, onlyName: false},
]);
</script>
<template #userCard1="ctx">
User name is: {{ ctx.user.name }} {{ ctx.test }}
</template >
<template #userCard2="{ user, test }">
User name is: {{ user.name }} {{ test}}
</template>
<template>
<div v-for="user in users">
<template is="userCard1" :user="user" test="1"></template>
<template is="userCard2" :user="user" test="2"></template>
</div>
</template> |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@hminghe that's exactly what I was thinking too 👌, looks great! I would even include the ability to pass slots inside |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
good design. But this means we need to add one more meaning to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Template Block ProposalWhen It comes to this proposal. I'd like to say that even though JSX is just better to use I do support this proposal. I think there are two ways to implement this feature. I call this Open vs Closed blocks. The way that I want this proposal to be implemented is simple. We get two new components. A block component and a outlet component. The reason why people have made this proposal is for reasons related to using JSX. Weaknesses of JSX
Vue BlockThe Open BlockThis component has one prop
Creation of Open Block Vue block <script setup>
defineProps<{name:string}>()
</script>
// This template works like a normal template
// It is not picked up by vue
<template v-bind="{name}">
<slot/>
</template>
**Implementation of Vue block ** <script setup>
const foo = "foo"
</script>
<vue:block name="random-text">
// The content in here will not be rendered
unless the outlet is used
{{ foo }}
</vue:block>
Closed BlockThis component has two props
Creation of Vue Closed Block <script setup generic="T extends Record<string,unknown>">
defineProps<{name:string, context:T}>()
</script>
// This template works like a normal template
// It is not picked up by vue
<template v-bind="{name}">
<slot name="context" v-bind="{...context}" />
</template>
Implementation of Vue block <script setup>
const foo = "foo"
</script>
<vue:block name="random-text" #context="{foo}">
// The content in here will not be rendered
unless the outlet is used
{{ foo }}
This has no acesss to the state so we grab to through the context.
</vue:block>
Vue Block OutletA block outlet is the component that decides where a **Implementation of Block Outlet ** // look at the block example to find out where these props come from
<vue:block-outlet block="random-text" :context="{foo}">
ExamplesLike I said in previous examples. I talked about the difference between closed and open blocks. An open block automatically has access to the state of the app. A closed block doesn't. I will demonstrate how one would work vs the other. Let's say that this is my Vue component. <script setup>
const links = [
"Home",
"About",
"Contact",
"Services",
]
</script>
<template>
<nav>
// this is supposed to be a hamburger menu
<div>
<span></span>
<span></span>
<span></span>
</div>
// this is a set of links
<ul>
<li v-for="link of links">
{{link}}
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</template>
My Vue component using open blocks <script setup>
const links = [
"Home",
"About",
"Contact",
"Services",
]
</script>
<template>
<nav>
// this is supposed to be a hamburger menu
<div>
<vue:block-outlet block="hamburger-menu" />
</div>
// this is a set of links
<ul>
<vue:block-outlet block="pages-links" />
</ul>
</nav>
</template>
<vue:block name="hamburger-menu">
<span></span>
<span></span>
<span></span>
</vue:block>
<vue:block name="pages-links">
<li v-for="link of links">
{{link}}
</li>
</vue:block>
**My Vue component using closed blocks ** <script setup>
const links = [
"Home",
"About",
"Contact",
"Services",
]
</script>
<template>
<nav>
// this is supposed to be a hamburger menu
<div>
<vue:block-outlet block="hamburger-menu" />
</div>
// this is a set of links
<ul>
<vue:block-outlet
block="pages-links"
:context="{links}"
/>
</ul>
</nav>
</template>
// These blocks have no acess to component state
<vue:block name="hamburger-menu">
<span></span>
<span></span>
<span></span>
</vue:block>
<vue:block name="pages-links" #context="{links}" >
<li v-for="link of links">
{{link}}
</li>
</vue:block>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think it's better to just use And I prefer open block because it's easy to use…… |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Open block share the same context with main template, while close block needs to create a new context which will cause performance cost that I think is't worth to pay. Open block is just like copy the text in template and paste into the dest location. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Good then I'd like to say that since you like the idea of an is component. There is a component that does use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The reason decided on a new api is because vue needs the template tag. It uses it to render components. I don't know why it does. but that just seems to be the case. I didn't want ask the team to destroy an aspect of the framework that allows it to work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hopefully one day I don't have to write template just to write a simple. Button component. Because for simple component's template was just overhead but now it can be used for important things if they decide to make it so that you don't have to write it just to create a component |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think this is a great idea. How would we import these though? What I really want is to be able to use this approach to make multiple components that share state and or style. Like for instance, a togglable dropdown where you can import the dropdown and the toggle handle seperatley and place them however you want while still having the toggle be able to trivially manipulate the state of the dropdown. Example: <script setup>
const dropdown= ref(false)
</script>
<template name="handle">
<button @click="dropdown = !dropdown">{{dropdown ? "close" : "open"}}</button>
</template>
<template name="dropdown">
<div :class="dropdown" :class="{ open: dropdown }">
<slot/>
</div>
</template>
<style scoped>
.dropdown {
overflow: hidden;
padding: 12px;
max-height: 300px;
transition: .4s;
}
.dropdown:not(.open) {
max-height: 0px;
}
</style>and then import like this: <script setup>
import Shelf from "./components/shelf.vue"
</script>
<template>
<Shelf.handle/>
<div>Some other random stuff to prove a point</div>
<Shelf.dropdown>
<p>Some item 1</p>
<p>Some item 2</p>
<p>Some item 3</p>
<p>Some item 4</p>
</Shelf.dropdown>
</template>I feel like these kinds of DX wins could help give Vue an edge over things like Svelte in particular. Since svelte doesnt encapsulate its html in template tags but Vue does. Vue has a uniqe opportunity to extend this already existing pattern to compose multiple templates in ways that Svelte would require a bigger deviation from its established patterns to be able to match. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I feel like you are asking for a bit much but since this feature is a feature that people want. I guess I'd like to ask what if I would not want a template to be exposed to the outside? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The JSX hate is real. I hope this works out. I don't have to switch contexts and I don't miss out on directives. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe they only get exposed if you give them a name attribute? Im not sure I understand the question fully though. Importing a componennt like this: "shelf.dropdown" would be the same as just importing Shelf regularly. In either case you are importing the template and the state same as you always have. Its just that - if you have multiple templates in one file, you can now decide to import the component with just one of the templates attached. If you dont want to expose that then just dont make multiple templates in your file - or dont import them if you do. Or, as I said, if this is really a problem then just decide if the template is pickable depending on whether it has a name attribute to be picked from in the first place. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It very useful idea, it can maintain consistency and avoid jsx syntax. I would like to let them as <script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue'
const msg = ref('msg')
const count = ref(0)
function inc() {
count.value++
}
</script>
<part name="one">
<span>{{ message }}</span>
</part>
<part name="two">
<span @click="inc">{{ count }}</span>
</part>
<template>
<div>
<template v-part:one></template>
<template v-part:two></template>
</div>
</template> |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
After refactoring my lib Anu's code from TSX to SFC, This is the only missing feature in SFC over TSX. In TSX I was assigning the btn content to some variable and later wrap the loader based on the loading prop. This was super easy in TSX however with SFC and template tag there's no other way. Thanks @sxzz I don't have to refactor the button component from SFC to TSX again 🤣 I'm using named template from vue-macros for now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Found an approach that requires no tooling support and you can use today: It also supports complete type checks. Give it a try, and I'd love to hear your feedback :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@louiss0 You spammed every single reply in this issue. 1 was enough. It's unhelpful 🤫 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I did that so that each person could get notified as you did. I think they will see it. The problem is that no one is talking about that plugin. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Nobody in any community wants to be spammed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Fine I just wanted to put an idea out there. I have to find a different way for people to notice what I say on the internet. I got excited when I saw that plugin. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm sorry I bothered you I decided to start a new discussion on this topic. vuejs/core#8651. I put my thoughts out there in full. I'm not going to bother you anymore. But I think you should consider what I was talking about. This is an important issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@hminghe Thank you for bringing up this topic this is a problem that needs to be solved the optimal way of doing this is to use nested SFC's See an example here. It's called vite-plugin-vue-nested-sfc |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm interested what you like about https://github.com/HunYan-io/vite-plugin-vue-nested-sfc compared to other alternatives? I'm going to look at vuejs/core#8651 later. I agree it'd be nice to have something in core. But I'm not sure it aligns with the core team's priorites.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think this one is the best because it solves all of our problems. The only problem with it so far is that it's a hack and not a native solution. There are some costs of using this plugin so far.
Those reasons are why I'm advocating for this solution. Other than the costs above this solution is superior to the other ones because you are just writing multiple components in one file. <template>
<h1>Home</h1>
<HelloWorld />
<Counter />
</template>
<component lang="vue" name="hello-world">
<template>
Hello World
</template>
</component>
<component name="counter">
<script lang="ts" setup>
import { ref } from 'vue';
const count = ref(0);
</script>
<template>
<button type="button" @click="count++">count is {{ count }}</button>
</template>
</component>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I linked another Vite plugin above. I agree the 1 you're using is unique because it wraps an entire SFC in a tag. For me the most important feature is integration with other tools. VueUse is the only option with Volar support because it's "just Vue". It's also the most likely to be maintained. SFCs conceptually enforce code organization. The use case for additional components would be to reduce duplication such as boilerplate like form elements or class names. In theory a nested component shouldn't need Nested SFCs and vuejs/core#8651 bypass the encapsulation of SFCs in general. When they need state it's probably time for a new SFC anyway. Thanks for creating a dedicated thread to share 💯 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi, guys! There's another approach coming out named "Vue Vine", and you can easily write multiple components, even just contain a bare template. Check out more details on Vue Vine docs. I hold the opinion that putting multiple templates (or we can say it is small fragments) is breaking the basic concept of "Single" file component. Over many years of iteration, the boundaries of SFC components are always first set in a single file, it doesn't make sense to create more rugged and winding approach to overpass its basic concepts, we should look for another way instead. So, I'm providing a more flexible organization approach for you to be able to write multiple components in 1 TS file, just like this:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What problem does this feature solve?
For example:
写组件的时候经常会有这个问题，然后又换成
tsx写，但是tsx的slot和expose是无法实现代码提示的。You often get this problem when you write components, and then switch to
tsx, butslotandexposedon't allow for code hints.What does the proposed API look like?
Template to:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions