New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(useArrayUnique): add a custom function to deduplicate #2612
Conversation
@@ -33,6 +33,24 @@ const list = reactive([1, 2, 2, 3]) | |||
const result = useArrayUnique(list) | |||
// result.value: [1, 2, 3] | |||
|
|||
result.value.push(1) | |||
result.push(1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason of this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry here should be list.push I have modified it in the latest commit
* @returns {Array} A computed ref that returns a unique array of items. | ||
*/ | ||
export function useArrayUnique<T>( | ||
list: MaybeComputedRef<MaybeComputedRef<T>[]>): ComputedRef<T[]> { | ||
return computed<T[]>(() => [...new Set<T>(resolveUnref(list).map(element => resolveUnref(element)))]) | ||
list: MaybeComputedRef<MaybeComputedRef<T>[]>, fn?: (a: T, b: T, array: T[]) => boolean): ComputedRef<T[]> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
list: MaybeComputedRef<MaybeComputedRef<T>[]>, fn?: (a: T, b: T, array: T[]) => boolean): ComputedRef<T[]> { | |
list: MaybeComputedRef<MaybeComputedRef<T>[]>, compareFn?: (a: T, b: T, array: T[]) => boolean): ComputedRef<T[]> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, I have renamed to compareFn
.
Description
thanks @bpolaszek for the #2610 contribution!
I think it seems more appropriate to use a custom function here
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
fixes #123
).