Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: add support "lineNumbers" option #278

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 28, 2020
Merged

Conversation

cap-Bernardito
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

Add support "lineNumbers" option

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #278 into master will decrease coverage by 0.25%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #278      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.63%   95.37%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         298      303       +5     
  Branches       89       93       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          285      289       +4     
- Misses         12       13       +1     
  Partials        1        1              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.js 94.59% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
src/utils.js 95.61% <0.00%> (-0.39%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 90ff982...168cd66. Read the comment docs.

@cap-Bernardito cap-Bernardito force-pushed the feat-lineNumbers branch 2 times, most recently from 3782f2f to ea32144 Compare September 28, 2020 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants