Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update description for --no-client-reconnect #4248

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 4, 2022

Conversation

snitin315
Copy link
Member

  • This is a bugfix
  • This is a feature
  • This is a code refactor
  • This is a test update
  • This is a docs update
  • This is a metadata update

For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?

updated snapshots.

Motivation / Use-Case

update description for --no-client-reconnect.

Breaking Changes

None.

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #4248 (949172b) into master (93675b6) will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4248      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.47%   92.34%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1541     1541              
  Branches      590      590              
==========================================
- Hits         1425     1423       -2     
- Misses        107      109       +2     
  Partials        9        9              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
bin/cli-flags.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/servers/WebsocketServer.js 89.74% <0.00%> (-5.13%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 93675b6...949172b. Read the comment docs.

@snitin315 snitin315 merged commit 317648d into master Feb 4, 2022
@snitin315 snitin315 deleted the fix-no-client-reconnect-des branch February 4, 2022 00:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants