Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make downloaded CUP file more robust #236

Open
mathias-muench opened this issue Jun 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Make downloaded CUP file more robust #236

mathias-muench opened this issue Jun 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mathias-muench
Copy link

Describe the Feature

In CUP file downloaded from WeGlide task, repeat first turnpoint in "takeoff" and last turnpoint in "landing".

Right now, takeoff and landing are empty (""). While SeeYou itself is quite happy with that, it leads to strange behavior in third-party applications. XCSoar skips the last turnpoint (see WeGlide task cup file not compatible with XCSoar · Issue #91 · weglide/bugtracker), Java TopTask repeats random other turnpoints.

According to SeeYou CUP file format description - SeeYou_CUP_file_format.pdf (2022), "takeoff" and "landing" are still part of the file format, although different applications obviously handle them differently. Repeating the first turnpoint in "takeoff" and last turnpoint in "landing" seems to make all systems happy that I am aware of.

Regardless of a discussion about "officially correct behavior", it would make things more robust, even for legacy systems.

Example

Current task line:

"744 km · Dreieck · DMSt · Unterwoessen Kirche","","Unterwoessen Kirche","Mariazell Tennisplatz","Flossenbuerg Burgruine","Unterwoessen Kirche",""

Proposed task line:

"744 km · Dreieck · DMSt · Unterwoessen Kirche","Unterwoessen Kirche","Unterwoessen Kirche","Mariazell Tennisplatz","Flossenbuerg Burgruine","Unterwoessen Kirche","Unterwoessen Kirche"
@mathias-muench mathias-muench added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants