Skip to content

bytes32 type is too strict #77

Closed
roninjin10 started this conversation in General
Feb 1, 2023 · 8 comments · 2 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 8 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@Raiden1411
Comment options

@tmm
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #76 on February 03, 2023 23:10.