Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

google_visualr conflict with ActiveAdmin/devise? #114

Open
dhock194 opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

google_visualr conflict with ActiveAdmin/devise? #114

dhock194 opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@dhock194
Copy link

dhock194 commented Jul 2, 2017

I have used google_visualr for one app -- works great. I then built another, leveraging ActiveAdmin to manage the backend, which uses Devise (https://github.com/plataformatec/devise) for authentication. Everything working for ActiceAdmin/Devise, but as I just add back the google_visualr gem, and restart puma for test, I get the following error. Looks like possibly Devise and google_visualr have conflicting helper methods?

google_visualr/app/helpers/view_helper.rb:7:in block in <module:ViewHelper>': undefined method helper_method' for ActionController::API:Class (NoMethodError)

Has anyone run into this, resolution or workaround for this?

@Shekharrajak
Copy link

Sometime I see similar error when I run rails s . But I found that after fixing some syntax error in my controller , it is working fine.

@dhock194
Copy link
Author

dhock194 commented Jul 3, 2017

I just did a test, creating a new rails app (-d mysql being the only modifier), added the ActiveAdmin gem, ran generate/install for aa, and a db:migrate -- basic but works fine. I then just add gem "google_visualr", "~> 2.5.1", and rails s no longer runs. No controllers have been created, other than by the AA install, so not sure where to look for a syntax error as you mentioned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants