Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation support and versions #28

Open
frehner opened this issue May 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Implementation support and versions #28

frehner opened this issue May 18, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@frehner
Copy link

frehner commented May 18, 2022

While reading this issue I was reminded how nice it is to see the current status of each runtime's support for a specific implementation and when that implementation was released. Much like the Browser Compatibilities list on MDN, or caniuse.com.

It's nice to note that Node and Deno have entries in some of the MDN compatibilities lists (like the one I linked above). However, given that there is a chance that the WinterCG has specs that are either unique or differ from those implemented by browsers, I have the following questions:

  1. Should WinterCG have a compatibility list?
  2. If yes, should that list be an addition to an existing list like MDN, or a new list?
    1. If adding to MDN, does that mean that CFWorkers should get on that list? And how does WinterCG handle it for standards that deviate or are unique?
    2. If adding a new list, where should that list live?

Hopefully that makes sense.

(I'm not sure if this was the right repo to ask this, sorry. Feel free to move it somewhere else if necessary)

@frehner
Copy link
Author

frehner commented May 26, 2022

Maybe this is better in the admin repo?

@lucacasonato
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I totally missed this. I'll move it to the admin repo.

@lucacasonato lucacasonato transferred this issue from wintercg/www Jun 2, 2022
@jasnell
Copy link
Contributor

jasnell commented Jun 4, 2022

A list would be good I think. We did try to get Workers added to MDN but the folks that manage that declined.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants