Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs] jsx-max-props-per-line: fix options example #3083

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 25, 2021

Conversation

MrRaiter
Copy link
Contributor

Small issues with jsx-max-props-per-line docs

Copy link
Member

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the fix/jsx-max-props-per-line-docs branch from 9ba3929 to a8ecd54 Compare September 25, 2021 05:49
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 25, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3083 (a8ecd54) into master (a4bf7da) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3083   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.55%   97.55%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines        7729     7729           
  Branches     2764     2764           
=======================================
  Hits         7540     7540           
  Misses        189      189           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a4bf7da...a8ecd54. Read the comment docs.

@ljharb ljharb changed the title Fix jsx-max-props-per-line options example [Docs] jsx-max-props-per-line: fix options example Sep 25, 2021
@ljharb ljharb merged commit a8ecd54 into jsx-eslint:master Sep 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants