You don’t need You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore

[SevenOutman]

One attracting part of this repo is that it teaches you how to compose lodash methods yourself - although you could as well refer to the original lodash repo which is also on GitHub.

When some of these functionalities are going to be reused up to 3 times, you may want to wrap them as util functions, and you will gradually have a collection of handy util functions - which happens to be a subset of the tree-shakable lodash that you used to be using with one simple import. Yes, the reason I use lodash is that I don't have to repeatedly recite these compositions.

I'm not trying to say that this repo is then useless - it's not, the implementation it demos are different from lodash and are more modern, which encourages people to stay up to date with latest ES capabilities. But I feel it's kind of hyping with this conclusive title. No wonder that people are raising issues like #355.

I would like to remind best-practice chasers not to be scared simply because the title goes "you don't need", and bother getting rid of lodash when you actually feel comfortable using it.