Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: migrate from api-documenter to typedoc #488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

divdavem
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@divdavem divdavem marked this pull request as draft December 22, 2023 13:40
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (863b243) 91.64% compared to head (588566d) 91.64%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #488   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.64%   91.64%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1209     1209           
  Branches      273      273           
=======================================
  Hits         1108     1108           
  Misses         50       50           
  Partials       51       51           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 79.56% <ø> (ø)
ut 60.29% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the typedoc branch 2 times, most recently from d7ee5ca to 762a080 Compare December 22, 2023 14:14
@divdavem
Copy link
Member Author

Note that all relative links (including the logo) from the README.md file are currently not properly handled in the resulting documentation.

@divdavem
Copy link
Member Author

Note that all relative links (including the logo) from the README.md file are currently not properly handled in the resulting documentation.

I have now replaced relative links by absolute links to GitHub.

@divdavem divdavem marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2023 15:25
Copy link

@fbasso fbasso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@divdavem
Copy link
Member Author

@fbasso Thank you for your review!

@divdavem divdavem merged commit fa786e9 into AmadeusITGroup:master Dec 22, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants