Adds MacOS Support

[alex-melnyk]

This PR replaces this one for macOS platform support.

• macos support #337

Pre-launch Checklist

• I made sure the project builds.
• I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
• I updated pubspec.yaml with an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy, or this PR is does not need version changes.
• I updated CHANGELOG.md to add a description of the change.
• I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
• I rebased onto main.
• I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR does not need tests.
• I made sure all existing and new tests are passing.
• I ran dart format . and committed any changes.
• I ran flutter analyze and fixed any errors.

This PR is fixes for comments of:
#946

[dkbast]

@mvanbeusekom is there anything I can do to help move this forward? @alex-melnyk I think the pipeline is now broken because of some deprecated material fields in the example app

[alex-melnyk]

Yes, please help me fix the pipeline

[dkbast]

@alex-melnyk I think I cant directly contribute here, but I fixed the warnings over at alex-melnyk#1

[shubhamsinghshubham777]

@alex-melnyk I think I cant directly contribute here, but I fixed the warnings over at alex-melnyk#1

@mvanbeusekom Are we waiting for anything else here? Seems like alex-melnyk#1 has fixed all warnings ✅ Could you please review it?

In the meantime, is there a way I could temporarily use alex-melnyk#1 in my current project?

Writing the following in pubspec.yaml doesn't work ❌

permission_handler:
    git: https://github.com/dkbast/flutter-permission-handler.git

[dkbast]

I believe you need to either add ref: main or remove the .git in the url

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (78a549c) 71.42% compared to head (a6ef4a5) 71.42%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1207   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.42%   71.42%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          35       35           
=======================================
  Hits           25       25           
  Misses         10       10           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	71.42% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[alex-melnyk]

@alex-melnyk I think I cant directly contribute here, but I fixed the warnings over at alex-melnyk#1

@mvanbeusekom Are we waiting for anything else here? Seems like alex-melnyk#1 has fixed all warnings ✅ Could you please review it?

In the meantime, is there a way I could temporarily use alex-melnyk#1 in my current project?

Writing the following in pubspec.yaml doesn't work ❌

permission_handler:
    git: https://github.com/dkbast/flutter-permission-handler.git

You need to override dependencies to use your implementation, here is example:

dependency_overrides:
  # https://github.com/Baseflow/flutter-permission-handler/pull/1207
  permission_handler:
    git:
      url: git@github.com:alex-melnyk/flutter-permission-handler.git
      path: permission_handler
      ref: master
  # https://github.com/Baseflow/flutter-permission-handler/pull/1207
  permission_handler_apple:
    git:
      url: git@github.com:alex-melnyk/flutter-permission-handler.git
      path: permission_handler_apple
      ref: master

[alex-melnyk]

@alex-melnyk I think I cant directly contribute here, but I fixed the warnings over at alex-melnyk#1

Thank you for the support!

[suriya-ganesh]

@mvanbeusekom bumping this up, as this PR would really help fixing a hole in the ecosystem, in terms of compatibility.

[hifiaz]

hi @alex-melnyk what do you think about permission CGPreflightScreenCaptureAccess and request CGRequestScreenCaptureAccess on macos? i search reference about this on flutter but still not found, so i use MethodChannel to request that

[Rileyjrjohns]

@mvanbeusekom Hello, could you please review this PR ? It's a really important features. Thanks :)

[efraespada]

Please, push it.

[Rileyjrjohns]

@mvanbeusekom up please