Add this to your Cargo.toml:
[dependencies]
thinset = "0.4"An implementation of a set and a map using a pair of sparse and dense arrays as backing stores, based on the paper "An efficient representation for sparse sets" (1993) by Briggs and Torczon.
This type of set is useful when you need to efficiently track set membership for integers from a large universe, but the values are relatively spread apart.
Compared to the standard library's HashSet, clearing a set is O(1) instead of O(n).
Compared to a bitmap-based set, iteration over the set is
proportional to the cardinality of the set (how many elements you have) instead of proportional to the maximum size of the set.
The main downside is that the set uses more memory than other set implementations. Its ideal usage is in
scenarios where the same set(s) can be reused many times (e.g. by using the clear operation).
The map behaves identically to the set with the exception that it tracks data alongside
the values that are stored in the set. Under the hood, SparseSet is a SparseMap of keys to ().
The table below compares the asymptotic complexities of several set operations for the sparse set when compared a bit set.
n is the number of elements in the set and u is the size of the set's universe.
| Operation | Sparse Set | Bit Set |
|---|---|---|
| Insertion | O(1) | O(1) |
| Removal | O(1) | O(1) |
| Lookup | O(1) | O(1) |
| Clear | O(1) | O(u) |
| Count | O(1) | O(u) |
| Iteration | O(n) | O(u) |
| Union | O(n) | O(u) |
| Intersection | O(n) | O(u) |
| Difference | O(n) | O(u) |
| Complement | O(n) | O(u) |
The following benchmarks were run on a 2020 MacBook Pro with a 2 GHz Intel Core i5 processor.
The benchmark compares SparseSet to the standard library's HashSet and the bit-set crate's BitSet.
It assumes the set is being reused by the program and new sets do not need to be created often.
When inserting 1000 random elements into the set from a universe of [0, 2^16) iterating over the set, and clearing it,
the sparse set is 1.7 faster than the HashSet and 1.6x faster than the BitSet:
SparseSet: 9,574 ns/iter (+/- 87)BitSet: 15,318 ns/iter (+/- 171)HashSet: 16,613 ns/iter (+/- 311)
Benchmarks are available in examples/bench.rs and can be run with the following command:
cargo run --example bench --releaseuse thinset::SparseSet;
let mut s: SparseSet<usize> = SparseSet::new();
s.insert(0);
s.insert(3);
s.insert(7);
s.remove(7);
if !s.contains(7) {
println!("There is no 7");
}
// Print 0, 1, 3 in some order
for x in s.iter() {
println!("{}", x);
}use thinset::{Pair, SparseMap};
let mut m: SparseMap<u32, u32> = SparseMap::new();
m.insert(13, 2);
m.insert(8, 16);
assert_eq!(m.get(13), Some(&2));
assert_eq!(m.get(6), None);
for Pair {key, value} in m.iter() {
println!("{key}:{value}");
}Take a look the ARCHITECTURE.md file to learn about the core design choices behind thinset, and about salient features of its implementation.
Dual-licensed for compatibility with the Rust project.
Licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0, or the MIT license: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT, at your option.