Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: re-enable appsec_iast_tdd_propagation suite #9190

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gnufede
Copy link
Member

@gnufede gnufede commented May 7, 2024

Reverts #8883

@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: revert-8883-gnufede/temp-disable-suite
Commit report: 36bab32
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 138514 Passed, 36464 Skipped, 7h 21m 5.99s Total duration (3h 50m 14.11s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 7, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-05-24 07:40:51

Comparing candidate commit 9cecf2a in PR branch revert-8883-gnufede/temp-disable-suite with baseline commit 609a306 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 209 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

@avara1986 avara1986 added the ASM Application Security Monitoring label May 24, 2024
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: revert-8883-gnufede/temp-disable-suite
Commit report: 9cecf2a
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 150055 Passed, 26387 Skipped, 9h 39m 49.74s Total duration (1h 50m 45.31s time saved)
⌛ 1 Performance Regression

⌛ Performance Regressions vs Default Branch (1)

  • test_schematized_operation_name[v1] - test_schematization.py 10.62s (+8.72s, +457%) - Details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ASM Application Security Monitoring
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants