Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@types/chart.js - add number array chart data type #44275

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 28, 2020

Conversation

awilson9
Copy link
Contributor

@awilson9 awilson9 commented Apr 27, 2020

Please fill in this template.

  • Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
  • Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
  • Add or edit tests to reflect the change. (Run with npm test.)
  • Follow the advice from the readme.
  • Avoid common mistakes.
  • Run npm run lint package-name (or tsc if no tslint.json is present).

If changing an existing definition:

  • Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: Add support for floating bar chart ([start, end]) chartjs/Chart.js#6056
  • [N/A] If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the header.
  • Include tests for your changes
  • [N/A ] If you are making substantial changes, consider adding a tslint.json containing { "extends": "dtslint/dt.json" }. If for reason the any rule need to be disabled, disable it for that line using // tslint:disable-next-line [ruleName] and not for whole package so that the need for disabling can be reviewed.

@awilson9
Copy link
Contributor Author

As per:
chartjs/Chart.js#6056
https://github.com/chartjs/Chart.js/releases/tag/v2.9.0

an array of numbers is a valid type for chart data. This enables support of floating bar charts.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Reviewers in Pull Request Status Board Apr 27, 2020
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Popular package This PR affects a popular package (as counted by NPM download counts). Awaiting reviewer feedback labels Apr 27, 2020
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented Apr 27, 2020

@awilson9 Thank you for submitting this PR!

🔔 @anuti @FabienLavocat @KentarouTakeda @larrybahr @mernen @josefpaij @danmana @guillaume-ro-fr @archy-bold @braincore @frabnt @alexdor @mahnuh @Conrad777 @adripanico @wertzui @lekoaf @ElianCordoba @indigolain @Ricardo-Mello @rnicholus @mrjack88 @canoceto @nobu222 @Marcoru97 @tonybadguy - please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

If no reviewer appears after a week, a DefinitelyTyped maintainer will review the PR instead.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings.

Let’s review the numbers, shall we?

Comparison details 📊
master #44275 diff
Batch compilation
Memory usage (MiB) 83.6 82.8 -1.0%
Type count 11021 11045 0%
Assignability cache size 34718 34736 0%
Language service
Samples taken 816 854 +5%
Identifiers in tests 816 854 +5%
getCompletionsAtPosition
    Mean duration (ms) 301.5 296.4 -1.7%
    Mean CV 10.6% 11.2%
    Worst duration (ms) 385.3 381.6 -1.0%
    Worst identifier options doughnutChartModel
getQuickInfoAtPosition
    Mean duration (ms) 303.5 297.6 -1.9%
    Mean CV 10.7% 11.1% +4.1%
    Worst duration (ms) 422.1 390.5 -7.5%
    Worst identifier itemSort usePointStyle

It looks like nothing changed too much. I won’t post performance data again unless it gets worse.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Perf: Same typescript-bot determined that this PR will not significantly impact compilation performance. label Apr 27, 2020
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented Apr 28, 2020

@awilson9 Thank you for submitting this PR!

Code Reviews

Because this is a widely-used package, a DT maintainer will need to review it before it can be merged.

🔔 @anuti @FabienLavocat @KentarouTakeda @larrybahr @mernen @josefpaij @danmana @guillaume-ro-fr @archy-bold @braincore @frabnt @alexdor @mahnuh @Conrad777 @adripanico @wertzui @lekoaf @ElianCordoba @indigolain @Ricardo-Mello @rnicholus @mrjack88 @canoceto @nobu222 @Marcoru97 @tonybadguy - please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

Status

  • ✅ No merge conflicts
  • ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
  • ✅ Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners or DT maintainers

All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes.


Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
  "type": "info",
  "pr_number": 44275,
  "author": "awilson9",
  "owners": [
    "anuti",
    "FabienLavocat",
    "KentarouTakeda",
    "larrybahr",
    "mernen",
    "josefpaij",
    "danmana",
    "guillaume-ro-fr",
    "archy-bold",
    "braincore",
    "frabnt",
    "alexdor",
    "mahnuh",
    "Conrad777",
    "adripanico",
    "wertzui",
    "lekoaf",
    "ElianCordoba",
    "indigolain",
    "ricardo-mello",
    "rnicholus",
    "mrjack88",
    "canoceto",
    "nobu222",
    "Marcoru97",
    "tonybadguy"
  ],
  "dangerLevel": "ScopedAndTested",
  "headCommitAbbrOid": "342a5c4",
  "headCommitOid": "342a5c4bd0c227bfcc576a94b4b907c7f91aec14",
  "mergeIsRequested": true,
  "stalenessInDays": 0,
  "lastCommitDate": "2020-04-27T20:00:14.000Z",
  "reviewLink": "https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/44275/files",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "authorIsOwner": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Popular",
  "anyPackageIsNew": false,
  "packages": [
    "chart.js"
  ],
  "files": [
    {
      "filePath": "types/chart.js/chart.js-tests.ts",
      "kind": "test",
      "package": "chart.js"
    },
    {
      "filePath": "types/chart.js/index.d.ts",
      "kind": "definition",
      "package": "chart.js"
    }
  ],
  "otherApprovalCount": 0,
  "ownerApprovalCount": 1,
  "maintainerApprovalCount": 0,
  "hasDismissedReview": false,
  "travisResult": "pass",
  "reviewersWithStaleReviews": [],
  "approvalFlags": 2,
  "isChangesRequested": false
}

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@awilson9 Everything looks good here. Great job! I am ready to merge this PR on your behalf.
If you'd like that to happen, please post a comment with the exact text

Ready to merge

and I'll merge it the next time I look at this PR.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Owner Approved A listed owner of this package signed off on the pull request. label Apr 28, 2020
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Author to Merge in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 28, 2020
@awilson9
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ready to merge

@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Author to Merge to Recently Merged in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 28, 2020
@typescript-bot typescript-bot merged commit 7d19d6f into DefinitelyTyped:master Apr 28, 2020
Pull Request Status Board automation moved this from Waiting for Reviewers to Done Apr 28, 2020
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

I just published @types/chart.js@2.9.20 to npm.

jjballano-qatium pushed a commit to jjballano-qatium/DefinitelyTyped that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2020
…hart data type by @awilson9

* add number array chart data type

* remove newline

* linting

* syntax error
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Owner Approved A listed owner of this package signed off on the pull request. Perf: Same typescript-bot determined that this PR will not significantly impact compilation performance. Popular package This PR affects a popular package (as counted by NPM download counts).
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants