Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Receipts are displayed in the full size of canvas when not needed #42174

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

samilabud
Copy link
Contributor

@samilabud samilabud commented May 14, 2024

Details

We are using the MultigestureCanvas to display the image/receipt, this component always try to fit the image to the content, this works perfectly for image that are bigger than the canvas size but when the image is lower than the canvas we can notice this issue.
We should verify if we need to use the scale to fit the canvas size before we try to fit the image in getCanvasFitScale, and if the image not need to be resized we should use the same image size

Fixed Issues

$ #40788
PROPOSAL: #40788 (comment)

Tests

  1. Go to home url / open the app
  2. Tap on Workspace chat
  3. Tap plus icon -- submit expense
  4. Submit an expense with below receipt attached
  5. Open the expense and tap on the receipt
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Go to home url / open the app
  2. Tap on Workspace chat
  3. Tap plus icon -- submit expense
  4. Submit an expense with below receipt attached
  5. Open the expense and tap on the receipt

QA Steps

  1. Go to home url / open the app
  2. Tap on Workspace chat
  3. Tap plus icon -- submit expense
  4. Submit an expense with below receipt attached
  5. Open the expense and tap on the receipt
  6. Check if the image is displayed correctly, zoom-in out work correctly, pagination (when multiple images).

Test image:
test dragon

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android.-.Receipt.inconsistent.test.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android.Chrome.-.Receipt.inconsistent.test.mp4
iOS: Native
IPhone.-.Receipt.inconsistent.test.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
IPhone.Safari.-.Receipt.inconsistent.test.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MAC.Chrome.-.Receipt.inconsistent.test.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
MAC.Desktop.-.Receipt.inconsistent.test.mov

@samilabud samilabud requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2024 21:17
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team May 14, 2024 21:17
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 14, 2024

@eVoloshchak Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from eVoloshchak May 14, 2024 21:17
const getCanvasFitScale: GetCanvasFitScale = ({canvasSize, contentSize}) => {
const shouldResize = shouldResizeToFit(canvasSize, contentSize);

const scaleX = canvasSize.width / contentSize.width;
const scaleY = canvasSize.height / contentSize.height;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can get rid of shouldResizeToFit altogether

    const trueScaleX = canvasSize.width / contentSize.width;
    const trueScaleY = canvasSize.height / contentSize.height;
    const scaleX = trueScaleX > 1 ? 1 : trueScaleX;
    const scaleY = trueScaleY > 1 ? 1 : trueScaleY;

@samilabud, could you please test if this works?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even simpler, we can use an already existing NumberUtils.clamp instead of the ternary

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh that makes a lot of sense thank you!, it seems to be working:

receipt.resize.clamp.test.mp4


const scaleX = clamp(trueScaleX, 0, 1);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const scaleX = clamp(trueScaleX, 0, 1);
const scaleX = clamp(canvasSize.width / contentSize.width, 0, 1);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


const scaleX = clamp(trueScaleX, 0, 1);
const scaleY = clamp(trueScaleY, 0, 1);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const scaleY = clamp(trueScaleY, 0, 1);
const scaleY = clamp(canvasSize.height / contentSize.height, 0, 1);

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the back end is having some problems, for me it's completely down, will resume testing when possible

Screenshot 2024-05-16 at 17 01 40

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Go to home url / open the app
  2. Tap on Workspace chat
  3. Tap plus icon -- submit expense
  4. Submit an expense with below receipt attached
  5. Open the expense and tap on the receipt

@samilabud, the testing steps can be improved. It's better to overexplain, so the QA team can test this properly

  • the test image isn't attached
  • include the last step to actually check if the image is displayed correctly, zoom-in out work correctly, etc

@samilabud
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • the test image isn't attached
  • include the last step to actually check if the image is displayed correctly, zoom-in out work correctly, etc

Done, please double check 🙏🏼

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

eVoloshchak commented May 17, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
screen-20240517-153701.1.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-05-17.at.16.28.31.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-05-17.at.16.16.28.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-17.at.16.18.18.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-17.at.16.14.26.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-05-17.at.16.15.00.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from arosiclair May 17, 2024 14:30
@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

@samilabud you should be able to merge main to fix those typecheck errors.

@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

arosiclair commented May 17, 2024

Thanks. I'll merge when the merge freeze is over.

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit 0cb2dc0 into Expensify:main May 31, 2024
14 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants