Inherited 'operator dot' is not callable when declared in separate file #972
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
I run upon a case where you are not able to call inherited
operator .
function because offield not found in (30503)
.I have added test case for the issue in this PR.
The case seems to be like this:
File_A: declare base
class (A)
withoperator .
File_B: declare derived
class B
fromclass A
File_C:
require File_B
, declare variable of typeclass B
and calloperator .
(it should be there becauseclass B
is derived fromclass A
)It is fixable by requiring
File_A
inFile_C
(along withFile_B
) but I suppose it is not how it was intended to work.