Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add entrypoint extraction to AppYaml parser #839

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 17, 2020

Conversation

loosebazooka
Copy link
Contributor

@loosebazooka loosebazooka commented Jun 13, 2020

part of #840

also fixes some naming in tests.

NOTE: build is broken because of #841

@loosebazooka
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased, this should be ready for review

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #839 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #839   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     78.45%   78.46%           
- Complexity      609      610    +1     
=========================================
  Files            96       96           
  Lines          2409     2410    +1     
  Branches        282      282           
=========================================
+ Hits           1890     1891    +1     
  Misses          411      411           
  Partials        108      108           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...n/java/com/google/cloud/tools/project/AppYaml.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 16.00 <1.00> (+1.00)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 46bdd3e...33237bf. Read the comment docs.

@loosebazooka loosebazooka merged commit df426fd into master Jun 17, 2020
@chanseokoh chanseokoh deleted the entrypoint-to-appyaml branch June 17, 2020 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants