Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add custom window constructor #126

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

idanrozin
Copy link

@idanrozin idanrozin commented Dec 31, 2022

So, this PR is related to issue #124 which I have opened.
This PR is for whomever is interested. Hope it helps and someone will take it to review and merge :)

Regarding the tests. I know it looks awful in the diff view, but what I essentially did is: I just created another test suite which runs the same tests but with the new constructor addition. So i needed to extract the functions logic outside and use closure for some functions.

But basically this is the new structure of the tests:

Before each and after each are the same except for the instantiation of StackdriverErrorReporter and window which is done inside the tests suites itself.

first suite -> same logic

second suite -> same logic just with new StackdriverErrorReporter(customWindow)

Thanks!

errorHandler.start({key: 'key', projectId: 'projectId'});
expect(errorHandler.serviceContext.service).to.equal('web');
});
function initialization() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This whole test file has been substantially re-written.
Can you share why this was needed?

To minimize risk of merging this PR, it would be best if this file:

  • was modified as little as possible
  • was kept as simple as possible (avoid having function that returns a function)

If you'd like to refactor this test file, it's best to do it in a separate PR

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, as I mentioned in the description of this PR, I'm not sure why, but in the git diff, it seems that I made a lot of changes to the tests.

But, I did not really changed much other than refactoring anonymous functions to named functions and then used them in the base cases and re-used them in the new test cases that are the same, but with a different object passed to the constructor.
Due to how mocha is built, I needed some of the functions to return a function because I needed to pass extra data and I didn't want to duplicate the same functions.

But if this concerns you, I can leave it as it was, and just duplicate some of the code which I think that is needed to test for specific test cases and that's it. I'm fine with whatever you decide.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
Yes, when it comes to tests, I prefer to minimize changes and refactoring, and to duplicate code if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants