Skip to content

Front-end single-page static website built with Typescript, React.js Hooks, Emotion (for CSS-in-JS), Tests, Redux, and fine-tuned with React-Specific Performance and Progressive Web Application capability. Site hosted on Github pages.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

JacobGrisham/React.js-Advanced-Hooks-and-Redux

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 

Repository files navigation

Coding project from the Udemy Course The Complete Junior to Senior Web Developer Roadmap

Demo

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • Javascript
    • ES6 map
    • Javascript Destructering
    • Higher order functions
  • React
    • React Fragment
    • React ErrorBoundary
    • React component nesting
    • React folder organization
    • Smart component (manages state) vs basic component
    • Class stateful component vs functional stateful component
    • React Hooks useState and useEffect
  • Redux
    • Redux connect vs useSelector and useDispatch
    • Redux middleware such as async actions using redux-thunk and logging using redux-logger
    • Redux folder organization
  • Performance Optimization
    • Website performance optimization using WebPageTest
    • React performance optimization using React.memo, PureComponent, and shouldComponentUpdate
    • React debugging and performance optimization using Chrome Dev Tools Performace tab and React Developer Tools
    • Route-based code splitting with React.lazy()
    • Component-based code splitting with react-loadable
  • Emotion
  • Progressive Web Applications (PWA)
  • Typescript
    • Dynamic vs Static Typing and Weakly vs Strongly Typed
    • Typescript commands tsc name_of_file.ts to run the Typescript compiler on the specified file, tsc --init to generate tsconfig.json file, and tsc name_of_file.ts --watch to enable hot-reloading for the specified file
    • Typescript types: boolean, number, string, array, objects, null, undefined, tuple, enum, any, void, never, interface, function, classes, and union
    • Refactoring applications with Typescript and using DefinitelyTyped to install the correct dependencies
    • Refactoring Typescript into a Progressive Web Application that uses React and Redux
  • Testing
    • Unit Tests, Integration Tests, Automation Tests
    • Testing behavior vs. implementation details

πŸ€” Senior Software Engineer Considerations

Why Use React, What Came Before It?

  • Precursor was jQuery, which uses imperative programming.
  • The problem with jQuery is that tracking and managing DOM changes were difficult, causing development slowdown when apps grow.
  • React is the solution for the view layer (web, mobile, desktop, VR, etc.).
  • React organizes html, css, and javascript based on components, which allows for re-use in other parts of your app, more DRY code.
  • React has one-way data flow: only children are aware of changes, parents aren't bothered since it doesn't affect them, which helps to decrease bugs.
  • React employs the Virtual DOM: "React bot" creates javascript object and automatically makes efficient changes to the DOM based on our inputs. This increases the performance of the web page and decreases bugs.
  • Analogy: We are no longer the painter holding the brush, we are now the artist directing the machine. More specifically, no more querySelectorAll, getElementById, and creating numerous event handlers.
  • React has a strong ecosystem and developer community.

Why use React Hooks, What Came Before It?

  • Stateful logic was bolted onto to the component. There was no way to (unscrew) abstract it and re-use it other components.
  • Lifecycle hooks within a component can grow to become unwieldy
  • Classes can increase the mental complexity since you have to track this, this.state

Why use Redux?

  • Share data between containers more easily. In React, you have to move the state up one layer to share data between/among components.
  • Manage large applications with complex state. React was built to manage the view, Redux was built to manage state.
  • Predictable state management using 3 principles:
    • Single source of truth. Centralized place to manage state for entire application.
    • State is read-only/immutable. Prevent unexpected errors.
    • Changes are made using pure functions. More predictable input/output relationship

What is Redux, What Came Before It?

  • 100's of Actions ==(middleware)==> 1 Reducer ====> 1 Store ==(React)==> Make Changes to DOM
  • jQuery was 1 Action ==> 1 Change in the DOM
  • Redux uses the Flux Pattern: Action --> Dispatcher --> Store --> View
  • Before the Flux Pattern was Model View Controller (MVC): Action --> Controller --> Many Models --> Many Views

Performance Optimization (Front-end)

  • Critical Render Path: use code splitting to stagger the timing that the files are sent to the client so as to reduce the initial loading time
  • Optimized Code: optimize for 'time to first meaningful paint' and 'time to interactive'
  • Progressive Web App

How do Progressive Web Applications (PWA) Work, and Why Use It?

  • PWA's use registered service workers as network proxies, intercepting calls to network to determine if a call the call can be satisfied with the Cache Storage API
  • Optimize performance
  • Enable limited offline availability and interaction
  • Support similar native experiences on mobile and desktop

Dynamic vs Static Typing, and What are their Strengths?

  • Static Typing requires declaring the 'type' of the variable explicitly (i.e. int, float, char, etc.)
  • Statically typed languages are self documenting, which helps avoid developer errors of using the wrong type. Statically typed languages are also self-testing, in that type errors surface during compilation instead of testing or in production
  • Dynamic Typing is not bound to a 'type'. Type checking is completed during runtime
  • Dynamically typed languages have a quicker developer learning curve, minimize code compliexity, and potentially allow for faster development

Weakly Typed vs Strongly Typed, and What are their Strengths?

  • Weakly typed languages allow for more flexibility in interpreting types (i.e. type coercion, such as the concatenation of an integer and a string)
  • Strongly typed languages requires types to be compatible

The Language Quadrant

  • Language Quadrant

What is Typescript and Why Use It?

  • Typescript is a superset of Javascript that makes Javascript evolve from a weakly typed, dynamic language to a strongly typed, static language. A superset means that the new language is a layer around the older language, giving you more methods and rules.
  • The ideal environment to use Typescript has the following characteristics: desire for less bugs in production, desire for code to be self-documenting, have budget to train developers to use it, and can afford a slower development cycle.
  • There are a few alternatives for Javascript that are similar to Typescript: flow, Reason, and elm. However, the developer community is currently leaning towards Typescript. As of 2020, Typescript is the second most loved language, and the fourth most wanted.

Unit Tests, Integration Tests, Automation Tests

  • Unit Tests: should cover all small, pure functions of an application. A pure function always has an input/outpu, doesn't affect another part of the program, and is deterministic (same input, same output). This is perhaps 90% of what you'll see. While building software, it's recommended to start here before moving on the other two test types.
  • Integration Tests: tests how different layers of the stack integrate or even how certain functions integrate with each other. Keep in mind that these tests are expensive in that they take a lot of energy think out, time to write, and may become obsolete when the code changes or a service is replaced. It's also hard to say when complete integration test coverage is achieved, since you can write near endless integration tests. You'll likely only see these tests in large companies with generous budgets and/or strong engineering teams.
  • Automation (UI) Tests: tests how the webpage behaves, often in a controlled environment (i.e. device screen size, specific browser, and specific browser version number). These tests are the most expensive in terms of time and money. Therefore, you'll likely only see these tests in large companies with generous budgets. Furthermore, these tests are the most infrequent, occuring before a release into production, once per week, or some other schedule. Can be completed manually by people and/or programmatically with code.
    • Options for the former include:
      • In-house testing
      • Contractors
      • Test company service provider
    • Options for the latter include:
      • webdriver: good documentation
      • testcafe: good starter, having all the tools in one (except cross-browser)

Testing Tools Matrix

Scaffolding Assertion Library Test Runner Mock, Spies, Stubs Code Coverage
jasmine jasmine jasmine jasmine istanbul
jest jest jest jest jest
mocha chai mocha sinon istanbul
. . karma . .
  • Mock: fake a function or behavior, often used in integration tests
  • Stubbing: replaces selected functions with another function to ensure that the expected behavior happens, for example: faking a server to test an API call
  • Spies: provide information about functions (how many times they were called, in what cases, and by who)
  • karma runs tests in the browser, which is inefficient. There are two alternatives:
    • Puppeteer, which is a headless browser,
    • jsdom, which mocks the javascript portion of the browser
  • React specific testing tools include:
    • Enzyme. Jest snapshots allow for DRY code by not having to repeatedly check that stateless (simple) components render approved code. However, the usefullness and popularity for Enzyme is falling.
    • React Testing Library. This library promotes testing of behavior rather than implementation details (unlike Enzyme).

Testing Philosophy and Methodology

  • Test behavior rather than implementation details to avoid false negatives and false positives when running tests. One major benefit of this methodology is that tests should remain valid even after a codebase refactor (no need to update tests when updating code).
  • "Automated tests should verify that the application code works for the production users." Kent C. Dodds. This philosphy clarifies the mission of testing in the first place. This mission statement also lends itself to the methodology of testing behavior rather than implementation details.
  • "Write Tests. Not too Many. Mostly Integration" Guillermo Rauch. Commentary and analysis by Kent C. Dodds. This pithy philosophy encourages developers not to skip writing tests, avoid diminishing returns of achieving 100% code coverage, and that integration tests give the most bang for your buck.

πŸš€ Getting Started

To run this project locally: In your terminal, navigate to the root folder and run the following commands

$ npm install
$ npm start

πŸ“£ Reference