refactor(luasnip): add extended configuration #3525
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
opalmay
force-pushed
the
luasnip-refactor
branch
from
5dc201d
to
93332f2
Compare
opalmay
reviewed
Feb 2, 2023
opalmay
force-pushed
the
luasnip-refactor
branch
from
93332f2
to
430a42d
Compare
waiting on the status of #3670 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
feat(luasnip): add virtual text to signal current insert point
feat: added lunarvim snippets and move luasnipt to seaprate config
chore: try to satisfy luacheck
chore: little fix to the extend
refactor(luasnip): simplify structure
How Has This Been Tested?
TBD